Literature DB >> 21701347

Survey says? A primer on web-based survey design and distribution.

Adam J Oppenheimer1, Christopher J Pannucci, Steven J Kasten, Steven C Haase.   

Abstract

The Internet has changed the way in which we gather and interpret information. Although books were once the exclusive bearers of data, knowledge is now only a keystroke away. The Internet has also facilitated the synthesis of new knowledge. Specifically, it has become a tool through which medical research is conducted. A review of the literature reveals that in the past year, over 100 medical publications have been based on Web-based survey data alone. Because of emerging Internet technologies, Web-based surveys can now be launched with little computer knowledge. They may also be self-administered, eliminating personnel requirements. Ultimately, an investigator may build, implement, and analyze survey results with speed and efficiency, obviating the need for mass mailings and data processing. All of these qualities have rendered telephone and mail-based surveys virtually obsolete. Despite these capabilities, Web-based survey techniques are not without their limitations, namely, recall and response biases. When used properly, however, Web-based surveys can greatly simplify the research process. This article discusses the implications of Web-based surveys and provides guidelines for their effective design and distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21701347      PMCID: PMC3124654          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182174413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  22 in total

1.  Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys.

Authors:  T K Schleyer; J L Forrest
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Eliciting survey cooperation: incentives, self-interest, and norms of cooperation.

Authors:  Martha E Kropf; Johnny Blair
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2005-12

3.  Web-based and mailed questionnaires: a comparison of response rates and compliance.

Authors:  Katarina Augustsson Bälter; Olle Bälter; Elinor Fondell; Ylva Trolle Lagerros
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Issues of representation in eHealth research (with a focus on web surveys).

Authors:  Mick P Couper
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Bias in surgical research.

Authors:  Carmen Paradis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Effect of participation incentives on the composition of national health surveys.

Authors:  Anne Moyer; Margaret Brown
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2008-10

Review 7.  Identifying and avoiding bias in research.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Do incentives exert undue influence on survey participation? Experimental evidence.

Authors:  Eleanor Singer; Mick P Couper
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Reconstructing the rheumatoid wrist: a utility analysis comparing total wrist fusion and total wrist arthroplasty from the perspectives of rheumatologists and hand surgeons.

Authors:  Christi M Cavaliere; Adam J Oppenheimer; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-04-28

10.  An economic analysis of hand transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Takashi Oda; Daniel Saddawi-Konefka; Melissa J Shauver
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  7 in total

1.  A kiosk survey of perception, attitudes and knowledge (PAK) of Australians concerning microbes, antibiotics, probiotics and hygiene.

Authors:  Rob DeSalle; Jared Wikins; Rod Kennett
Journal:  Health Promot J Austr       Date:  2021-08-30

2.  An evaluation of seasonal variations in footwear worn by adults with inflammatory arthritis: a cross-sectional observational study using a web-based survey.

Authors:  Angela Brenton-Rule; Gordon J Hendry; Georgina Barr; Keith Rome
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Perceived barriers to the management of foot health in patients with rheumatic conditions.

Authors:  Nina Lansdowne; Angela Brenton-Rule; Matthew Carroll; Keith Rome
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Managing an online survey about influenza vaccination in primary healthcare workers.

Authors:  Diana Toledo; Nicole Aerny; Núria Soldevila; Maretva Baricot; Pere Godoy; Jesús Castilla; Susana García-Gutierrez; Núria Torner; Jenaro Astray; José María Mayoral; Sonia Tamames; Fernando González-Candelas; Vicente Martín; José Díaz; Angela Domíguez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Experience of finding footwear and factors contributing to footwear choice in people with gout: a mixed methods study using a web-based survey.

Authors:  Angela Brenton-Rule; Nicola Dalbeth; N Lawrence Edwards; Keith Rome
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  A survey of people with foot problems related to rheumatoid arthritis and their educational needs.

Authors:  Andrea S Graham; John Stephenson; Anita E Williams
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  More is not Always Better: An Epidemiological Assessment of Migraine Frequency and the Impact on Relationships.

Authors:  Amy Wachholtz; Amrita Bhowmick; L B Herbert; Dawn Marcus
Journal:  J Pain Manag Med       Date:  2017-07-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.