Literature DB >> 19380558

CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.

Perry J Pickhardt1, Cesare Hassan, Andrea Laghi, David H Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: CT colonography (CTC) is a recommended test for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening according to the updated 2008 American Cancer Society guidelines. CTC can also accurately detect abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This collaborative gastroenterology-radiology project evaluated the cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of CTC in the Medicare population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computerized Markov model simulated the development of CRC and AAA in a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 U.S. adults > or = 65 years old. Screening with CTC at 5- and 10-year intervals using a 6-mm size threshold for polypectomy was compared with primary optical colonoscopy screening every 10 years and with no screening. Base case costs for CTC and optical colonoscopy were $674 and $795, respectively. The costs of the imaging workup for extracolonic findings at CTC were also included.
RESULTS: CTC resulted in 7,786 and 7,027 life-years gained at 5- and 10-year intervals, respectively, compared with 6,032 life-years gained with 10-year optical colonoscopy. The increase in overall efficacy with CTC was primarily due to prevention of AAA rupture because CRC prevention and CRC detection rates were similar for CTC and optical colonoscopy. All three strategies were highly cost-effective compared with no screening, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $6,088, $1,251, and $1,104 per life-year gained for 5-year CTC, 10-year CTC, and 10-year optical colonoscopy strategies, respectively. The ICER of 5-year CTC and 10-year CTC versus optical colonoscopy was $23,234 and $2,144 per life-year gained, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Because of its ability to simultaneously screen for both CRC and AAA, CTC is a highly cost-effective and clinically efficacious screening strategy for the Medicare population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19380558     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  18 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.

Authors:  Amy B Knudsen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; James E Savarino; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Karen M Kuntz; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Re: Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; Cesare Hassan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Evidence review and status update on computed tomography colonography.

Authors:  Darren Boone; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-10

4.  CT Colonographic Screening of Patients With a Family History of Colorectal Cancer: Comparison With Adults at Average Risk and Implications for Guidelines.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Ifeanyi Mbah; B Dustin Pooler; Oliver T Chen; J Louis Hinshaw; Jennifer M Weiss; David H Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Potentially Important Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography: Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.

Authors:  B Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Indeterminate but Likely Unimportant Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography (C-RADS Category E3): Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.

Authors:  B Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Modelling cost-effectiveness of a biomarker-based approach to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Solomon L Woldu; Oner Sanli; Peter Black; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Emerging stool-based and blood-based non-invasive DNA tests for colorectal cancer screening: the importance of cancer prevention in addition to cancer detection.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-08

10.  Diagnostic Performance of Multitarget Stool DNA and CT Colonography for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Benjamin Weigman; Nimrod Deiss-Yehiely; Cesare Hassan; Jennifer M Weiss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.