Literature DB >> 32779997

Diagnostic Performance of Multitarget Stool DNA and CT Colonography for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Perry J Pickhardt1, Peter M Graffy1, Benjamin Weigman1, Nimrod Deiss-Yehiely1, Cesare Hassan1, Jennifer M Weiss1.   

Abstract

BackgroundMultitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) screening has increased rapidly since simultaneous approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 2014, whereas CT colonography screening remains underused and is not covered by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.PurposeTo report postapproval clinical experience with mt-sDNA screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and compare results with CT colonography screening at the same center.Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, asymptomatic adults underwent clinical mt-sDNA screening during a 5-year interval (2014-2019). Electronic medical records were searched to verify test results and document subsequent optical colonoscopy and histopathologic findings. A similar analysis was performed for CT colonography screening during a 15-year interval (2004-2019), with consideration of thresholds for positivity of both 6-mm and 10-mm polyp sizes. χ2 or two-sample t tests were used for group comparisons.ResultsA total of 3987 asymptomatic adult patients (mean age, 64 years ± 9 [standard deviation]; 2567 women) underwent mt-sDNA screening and 9656 patients (mean age, 57 years ± 8; 5200 women) underwent CT colonography. Test-positive rates for mt-sDNA and for 6-mm- and 10-mm-threshold CT colonography were 15.2%, 16.4%, and 6.7%, respectively. Optical colonoscopy follow-up rates for positive results of mt-sDNA and 6-mm- and 10-mm-threshold CT colonography were 13.1%, 12.3%, and 5.9%, respectively. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for any neoplasm 6 mm or greater, advanced neoplasia, and CRC for mt-sDNA were 54.2%, 22.7%, and 1.9% respectively; for 6-mm-threshold CT colonography, PPVs were 76.8%, 44.3%, and 2.7%; for 10-mm-threshold CT colonography, PPVs were 84.5%, 75.2%, and 5.2%, respectively (P < .001 for mt-sDNA vs CT colonography for all except 6-mm CRC at CT colonography). For mt-sDNA versus 6-mm-threshold CT colonography, overall detection rates for advanced neoplasia were 2.7% and 5.0%, respectively (P < .001); corresponding detection rates for CRC were 0.23% and 0.31%, respectively (P = .43).ConclusionThe detection rates of advanced neoplasia at CT colonography screening were greater than those of multitarget stool DNA. Detection rates were similar for colorectal cancer.© RSNA, 2020See also the editorial by Yee in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32779997      PMCID: PMC7945994          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020201018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  43 in total

1.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Inku Hwang; James A Butler; Michael L Puckett; Hans A Hildebrandt; Roy K Wong; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; William R Schindler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Screening CT colonography: how I do it.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Performance of multitarget stool DNA testing in African American patients.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Sanford D Markowitz; Zhengyi Chen; Missy Tuck; Joseph E Willis; Barry M Berger; Dean E Brenner; Li Li
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Multitarget stool DNA test: clinical performance and impact on yield and quality of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  David H Johnson; John B Kisiel; Kelli N Burger; Douglas W Mahoney; Mary E Devens; David A Ahlquist; Seth Sweetser
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography.

Authors:  Theodore J Shinners; Perry J Pickhardt; Andrew J Taylor; Debra A Jones; Cara H Olsen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Lawrence J Lee; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Travis Lauder; Richard J Bruce; Ron M Summers; B Dustin Pooler; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Potentially Important Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography: Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.

Authors:  B Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.

Authors:  C Daniel Johnson; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Alicia Y Toledano; Jay P Heiken; Abraham Dachman; Mark D Kuo; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Amy K Hara; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; Judy Yee; Benjamin A Herman; Lawrence J Burgart; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Imaging and Screening for Colorectal Cancer with CT Colonography.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  Emerging stool-based and blood-based non-invasive DNA tests for colorectal cancer screening: the importance of cancer prevention in addition to cancer detection.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-08
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Shailavi Jain; Jetrina Maque; Artin Galoosian; Antonia Osuna-Garcia; Folasade P May
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-03-22

Review 2.  Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Aneta L Zygulska; Piotr Pierzchalski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.