Feng Wang1, Jian Zhang, Wei Fang, Shi-Hua Zhao, Min-Jie Lu, Zuo-Xiang He. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiovascular Institute and Fu Wai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 167, Bei Li Shi Lu, 100037, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic/end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV) and ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference method. Furthermore, software-specific characteristics of Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS), Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTB) and 4D-MSPECT were analysed. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with dilated cardiomyopathy who underwent gated (99m)Tc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile SPECT and cardiac MRI were included. LV EDV, ESV and LVEF values of gated SPECT were calculated using QGS, ECTB and 4D-MSPECT. RESULTS: The correlation between the results of gated SPECT and cardiac MRI was excellent for EDV [R = 0.872 (QGS), R = 0.879 (ECTB), R = 0.869 (4D-MSPECT)], ESV [R = 0.908 (QGS), R = 0.897 (ECTB), R = 0.880 (4D-MSPECT)] and LVEF [R = 0.794 (QGS), R = 0.763 (ECTB), R = 0.710 (4D-MSPECT)]. EDV and ESV assessed by QGS did not differ significantly from those assessed by cardiac MRI (all p = NS), whereas EDV and ESV were overestimated by ECTB and 4D-MSPECT compared with cardiac MRI (all p < 0.05). LVEF was overestimated by QGS, ECTB and 4D-MSPECT compared with cardiac MRI (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between gated SPECT and cardiac MRI is excellent for LV volume and LVEF values calculated by QGS, ECTB and 4D-MSPECT in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. However, algorithm-varying over- or underestimation of LV volumes and LVEF should be accounted for in the clinical context.
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic/end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV) and ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference method. Furthermore, software-specific characteristics of Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS), Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTB) and 4D-MSPECT were analysed. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with dilated cardiomyopathy who underwent gated (99m)Tc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile SPECT and cardiac MRI were included. LV EDV, ESV and LVEF values of gated SPECT were calculated using QGS, ECTB and 4D-MSPECT. RESULTS: The correlation between the results of gated SPECT and cardiac MRI was excellent for EDV [R = 0.872 (QGS), R = 0.879 (ECTB), R = 0.869 (4D-MSPECT)], ESV [R = 0.908 (QGS), R = 0.897 (ECTB), R = 0.880 (4D-MSPECT)] and LVEF [R = 0.794 (QGS), R = 0.763 (ECTB), R = 0.710 (4D-MSPECT)]. EDV and ESV assessed by QGS did not differ significantly from those assessed by cardiac MRI (all p = NS), whereas EDV and ESV were overestimated by ECTB and 4D-MSPECT compared with cardiac MRI (all p < 0.05). LVEF was overestimated by QGS, ECTB and 4D-MSPECT compared with cardiac MRI (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between gated SPECT and cardiac MRI is excellent for LV volume and LVEF values calculated by QGS, ECTB and 4D-MSPECT in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. However, algorithm-varying over- or underestimation of LV volumes and LVEF should be accounted for in the clinical context.
Authors: Barry J Maron; Jeffrey A Towbin; Gaetano Thiene; Charles Antzelevitch; Domenico Corrado; Donna Arnett; Arthur J Moss; Christine E Seidman; James B Young Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-03-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Grzybowski; Z T Bilińska; W Ruzyłło; W Kupść; E Michalak; D Szcześniewska; W Poplawska; W Rydlewska-Sadowska Journal: J Card Fail Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Peter G Danias; Georgios I Papaioannou; Alan W Ahlberg; David M O'Sullivan; April Mann; William E Boden; Gary V Heller Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Berlinda J van der Veen; Arthur J Scholte; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Marcel P M Stokkel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Carol Chen-Scarabelli; Chad McRee; Massoud A Leesar; Fadi G Hage; Tiziano M Scarabelli Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Maryam Shojaeifard; Tahereh Ghaedian; Nahid Yaghoobi; Hadi Malek; Hasan Firoozabadi; Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi; Majid Haghjoo; Ahmad Amin; Nasrin Azizian; Feridoon Rastgou Journal: Res Cardiovasc Med Date: 2015-12-19