Literature DB >> 19375888

Grading acetabular defects: the need for a universal and valid system.

Norman A Johanson1, Kim R Driftmier, Douglas L Cerynik, Charles C Stehman.   

Abstract

Preoperative classification of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty has been problematic. An evidence-based approach involves having a validated and widely accepted system of classification. A prerequisite would be a system that describes each defect in terms that are mutually exclusive, hierarchical, surgically relevant, and corresponding to experienced clinicians' preoperative estimates of surgical complexity. Of the 6 systems reviewed, only 1 demonstrated the reliability and validity required for a standardized grading system. Although high-grade defects were seen in only 17% of the 1094 hips, the failure rate associated with them was 30%. A larger population of high grade defects is necessary to determine which treatment alternatives are successful. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19375888     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  15 in total

1.  [Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer; A Toepfer; H Pilge; B M Holzapfel; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Classifications in brief: Paprosky classification of acetabular bone loss.

Authors:  Jessica J M Telleria; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Jody Litrenta; Jay M Zampini; Frederic Kleinbart; Haviva M Goldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols.

Authors:  K Horas; J Arnholdt; A F Steinert; M Hoberg; M Rudert; B M Holzapfel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Validity and reliability of the Paprosky acetabular defect classification.

Authors:  Raymond Yu; Jochen G Hofstaetter; Thomas Sullivan; Kerry Costi; Donald W Howie; Lucian B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

7.  A New Classification System for Acetabular Bone Defect Evaluation in Posttraumatic Acetabular Nonunion and Malunion.

Authors:  Ramesh K Sen; Reet Mukhopadhyay; Veeresh Pattanshetti; Gaurav Saini; Sujit Kumar Tripathy; Siddharth Sekhar Sethy; Suresh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.033

8.  Use of a new off-the-shelf 3D-printed trabecular titanium acetabular cup in Chinese patients undergoing hip revision surgery: Short- to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Guangqian Shang; Shuai Xiang; Cuicui Guo; Jianjun Guo; Peng Wang; Yingzhen Wang; Hao Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.562

9.  Reliability and validity test of a novel three-dimensional acetabular bone defect classification system aided with additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Jingwei Zhang; Yi Hu; Hua Ying; Yuanqing Mao; Zhenan Zhu; Huiwu Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.562

10.  Quantitative Computerized Assessment of the Degree of Acetabular Bone Deficiency: Total radial Acetabular Bone Loss (TrABL).

Authors:  Frederik Gelaude; Tim Clijmans; Hendrik Delport
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.