Literature DB >> 36052394

A New Classification System for Acetabular Bone Defect Evaluation in Posttraumatic Acetabular Nonunion and Malunion.

Ramesh K Sen1, Reet Mukhopadhyay1, Veeresh Pattanshetti1, Gaurav Saini1, Sujit Kumar Tripathy2, Siddharth Sekhar Sethy2, Suresh Kumar Sharma3.   

Abstract

Introduction: There is no distinct classification system to evaluate the bone defect in previously managed acetabular fractures. We propose a new classification system for bone defect evaluation in a previously managed acetabular fracture that will be helpful for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Materials and
Methods: The preoperative pelvis radiographs of 99 THA patients with previous acetabular fractures with at least 2 years of follow-up were evaluated by 10 experienced surgeons (Paprosky and new classification systems). As per the new classification system, the five types of bone defects are circumferential, posterior wall, posterior column, both column defect, and anterior column. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated, and a consensus management plan based on the recommendation of the observers was formulated.
Results: There was fair interobserver reliability for Paprosky classification (alpha coefficient 0.39) and substantial interobserver reliability for the new classification (alpha co-efficient 0.71). There was a substantial intraobserver agreement for the new classification (kappa value 0.80) and moderate intraobserver agreement for Paprosky classification (kappa value 0.55). Sixty-nine patients who were treated as per the management plan of the observers reported significant improvement in modified Harris hip score (improved from 25 to 85.88, p < 0.001). 89.7% of patients reported good to excellent outcomes. Overall best health as per EQ-5D VAS was obtained in THA following anterior column fracture (EQ-5D VAS 97.5), and relatively poor health was obtained after THA of posterior column nonunion (EQ-FD VAS 80). Conclusions: The new classification system for bone defect evaluation in previously treated acetabular fractures is valid and reliable. The proposed surgical plan for the management of bone defects in THA provided good to excellent outcomes. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabulum; Bone defect; Neglected acetabulum fracture; Paprosky; Total hip replacement

Year:  2022        PMID: 36052394      PMCID: PMC9385917          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00677-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  23 in total

Review 1.  Grading acetabular defects: the need for a universal and valid system.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Kim R Driftmier; Douglas L Cerynik; Charles C Stehman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture.

Authors:  Anil Ranawat; Jonathan Zelken; David Helfet; Robert Buly
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Management of neglected acetabular fractures.

Authors:  L A Veerappa; S K Tripathy; R K Sen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Validity and reliability of the Paprosky acetabular defect classification.

Authors:  Raymond Yu; Jochen G Hofstaetter; Thomas Sullivan; Kerry Costi; Donald W Howie; Lucian B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  CORR Insights®: Validity and reliability of the Paprosky acetabular defect classification.

Authors:  Wayne G Paprosky; Michael B Cross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Total hip arthroplasty after fracture of the acetabulum. Long-term results.

Authors:  D W Romness; D G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-09

7.  A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery.

Authors:  Charles Gozzard; Ashley Blom; A Taylor; Evert Smith; Ian Learmonth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Deepak Gautam; Saurabh Gupta; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-17

10.  Acetabular defect classification and management : Revision arthroplasty of the acetabular cup based on 3-point fixation.

Authors:  Mohamed Ghanem; Dirk Zajonz; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Andreas Roth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.