Literature DB >> 19375088

Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort.

James E Lingeman1, Glenn M Preminger, Evan R Goldfischer, Amy E Krambeck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the near term comfort of newly designed ureteral study stents or marketed control stents, including Polaris and Percuflex stents. Study stents had distal 6Fr pigtail ends with 3Fr or less loops. Decreased material in situ was hypothesized to enhance comfort. Usefulness of the patient self-administered Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (Stone Management Unit, Southmead Hospital, United Kingdom) was assessed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This 4-arm multicenter study enrolled adults requiring retrograde unilateral ureteral stent placement for 4 to 28 days. Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire administration was done before placement (baseline), on day 4 after placement and on day 30 after removal. A total of 236 patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the short loop tail stent (60), the long loop tail stent (59), the Percuflex Plus stent (64) and the Polaris stent (53).
RESULTS: Overall pain worsened from baseline to day 4 and improved from days 4 to 30. Mean pain medication use peaked for all stents on day 1 after placement. Common device related symptoms were mild or moderate in severity, including flank pain in 47 patients, hematuria in 39, dysuria in 34, frequent urination in 30 and urinary urgency in 27. Six patients experienced a total of 9 device related adverse events requiring hospitalization. All adverse events resolved, including most within 3 days of inpatient treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Although it was not statistically significant, patients stented with the short loop tail had lower questionnaire pain scores on day 4 after placement and lower pain medication use on day 1 after placement when pain peaked in all stent groups, suggesting that ureteral stent comfort, especially pain, may be improved by less material in situ. The Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire may be better suited for longer term comparisons in stented vs nonstented patients, rather than in this short-term ureteral stent trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19375088      PMCID: PMC3164810          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

1.  Does the size of ureteral stent impact urinary symptoms and quality of life? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Rocco Damiano; Riccardo Autorino; Marco De Sio; Francesco Cantiello; Giuseppe Quarto; Sisto Perdonà; Rosario Sacco; Massimo D'Armiento
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of quality of life to aid outcome analysis.

Authors:  H B Joshi; A Stainthorpe; F X Keeley; R MacDonagh; A G Timoney
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Ureteral stents. Indications, variations, and complications.

Authors:  B Saltzman
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Symptoms arising from Double-J ureteral stents.

Authors:  S G Pollard; R Macfarlane
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Comparison of symptom characteristics of indwelling ureteral catheters.

Authors:  J L Pryor; M J Langley; A D Jenkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Self-retaining ureteral stents: analysis of factors responsible for patients' discomfort.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Ahmed M El-Assmy; Ahmed M Shoma; Ibrahim Eraky; Mahmoud R El-Kenawy; Hamdy A El-Kappany
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Ureteral stents: morbidity and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  Dan Leibovici; Amir Cooper; Arie Lindner; Regina Ostrowsky; Judy Kleinmann; Sergey Velikanov; Helio Cipele; Eliahu Goren; Yoram I Siegel
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 0.892

8.  Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure.

Authors:  H B Joshi; N Newns; A Stainthorpe; R P MacDonagh; F X Keeley; A G Timoney
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility.

Authors:  H B Joshi; A Stainthorpe; R P MacDonagh; F X Keeley; A G Timoney; Michael J Barry
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  'Firm' versus 'soft' double pigtail ureteric stents: a randomised blind comparative trial.

Authors:  G M Lennon; J A Thornhill; P A Sweeney; R Grainger; T E McDermott; M R Butler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Current status of ureteral stent technologies: comfort and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Carlos E Mendez-Probst; Alfonso Fernandez; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Ureteral stents: new ideas, new designs.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Iason Kyriazis; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Pantelis Kraniotis; Christos Rigopoulos; Dimitrios Karnabatidis; Theodore Petsas; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

3.  α1-blockers for the reduction of ureteric stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Wan-Li Hu; Bei Cheng; Long Cheng; Yang-Jun Zeng; Gang Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Freeze-casting porous chitosan ureteral stents for improved drainage.

Authors:  Kaiyang Yin; Prajan Divakar; Ulrike G K Wegst
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Changing to a loop-type ureteral stent decreases patients' stent-related symptoms.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Takehiko Ogawa; Hiroji Uemura; Yoshinobu Kubota; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-08-17

6.  The impact of ureteral stent indwelling time on the treatment of acute infection caused by ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Yun-Feng Shi; Wen-Long Ju; Yi-Ping Zhu; Shu-Jie Xia; Xiao-Wen Sun
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Preoperative Belladonna and Opium Suppository for Ureteral Stent Pain: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study.

Authors:  Franklin C Lee; Sarah K Holt; Ryan S Hsi; Brandon M Haynes; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  A randomized controlled trial evaluating sildenafil citrate in relieving ureteral stent-related symptoms.

Authors:  Mohamed Tharwat; Mohamed M Elsaadany; Ahmed M Lashin; Ahmed R El-Nahas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  A randomized controlled trial comparing alpha blocker (tamsulosin) and anticholinergic (solifenacin) in treatment of ureteral stent-related symptoms.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed Tharwat; Mohamed Elsaadany; Ahmed Mosbah; Mohamed A Gaballah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Combined percutaneous and transurethral lithotripsy for forgotten ureteral stents with giant encrustation.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammadreza Rabani
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2012-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.