Literature DB >> 16106772

Ureteral stents: morbidity and impact on quality of life.

Dan Leibovici1, Amir Cooper, Arie Lindner, Regina Ostrowsky, Judy Kleinmann, Sergey Velikanov, Helio Cipele, Eliahu Goren, Yoram I Siegel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stents offer a simple and effective drainage method for the upper urinary tract. However, ureteral stents are associated with frequent side effects, including irritative voiding symptoms and hematuria.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the side effects associated with ureteral stents and their impact on sexual function and quality of life.
METHODS: Symptom questionnaires were administered to 135 consecutive patients with unilateral ureteral stents. The questionnaire addressed irritative voiding symptoms, flank pain, hematuria, fever, loss of labor days, anxiety, sleep impairment, decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, dyspareunia, painful ejaculation, and a subjective overall impact on quality of life. The items were graded from 1 (minimal or no symptoms) to 5 (maximal symptoms). The patients were seen and questionnaires filled at 2 weekly intervals following stent insertion until stent extraction. Following removal of the stent, stent patency, impaction and migration rates were determined. Admissions to hospital and ancillary procedures to retreive stents were noted.
RESULTS: The findings presented refer to questionnaire items scoring 3 or more. Dysuria, urinary frequency and urgency were reported by 40%, 50% and 55% of the patients, respectively. Flank pain, gross hematuria or fever was reported by 32%, 42% and 15% respectively. Among working patients, 45% lost at least 2 labor days during the first 14 days, and 32% were still absent from work by day 30. A total of 435 labor days were lost in the first month. Anxiety and sleep disturbance were reported by 24% and 20% respectively, and 45% of patients reported impairment in their quality of life. Decreased libido was reported by 45%, and sexual dysfunction by 42% of men and 86% of women. Stent removal necessitated ureteroscpoy in 14 patients (10.5%), due to upward migration in 11 (8.2%) and incrustration and impaction in 3. Spontaneous stent expulsion occurred in one patient. Forty-six stents (34%) were obstructed at the time of removal. Obstructed stents were associated with a longer mean dwell time as compared to the whole population, 75 versus 62 days respectively (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral stents are associated with frequent side effects and significant impact on patient quality of life. Our findings should be considered when deciding on ureteral stent insertion and dwell time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16106772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J            Impact factor:   0.892


  28 in total

1.  The double wire technique: an alternative method for difficult ureteroscopic access.

Authors:  Yakup Bostanci; Ender Ozden; Fatih Atac; Yarkin Kamil Yakupoglu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-07-04

Review 2.  Current status of ureteral stent technologies: comfort and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Carlos E Mendez-Probst; Alfonso Fernandez; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Percutaneous nephrostomy vs ureteral stent for hydronephrosis secondary to ureteric calculi: impact on spontaneous stone passage and health-related quality of life-a prospective study.

Authors:  Nuno de Sousa Morais; José P Pereira; Paulo Mota; Emanuel Carvalho-Dias; João N Torres; Estêvão Lima
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  A preliminary study of the variability in location of the ureteral orifices with bladder filling by fluoroscopic guidance: the gender difference.

Authors:  Insang Hwang; Sun-Ouck Kim; Ho-Song Yu; Eu-Chang Hwang; Seung-Il Jung; Taek-Won Kang; Dongdeuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Effectiveness of medical treatment in overcoming the ureteral double-J stent related symptoms.

Authors:  Ugur Kuyumcuoglu; Bilal Eryildirim; Murat Tuncer; Gokhan Faydaci; Fatih Tarhan; Aydin Ozgül
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.

Authors:  Sarah Mozafarpour; Briony Norris; James Borin; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Ureteric stenting with magnetic retrieval: an alternative to traditional methods.

Authors:  John A O'Kelly; Usman M Haroon; Abdul J Rauf; Kieran J Breen; Barry B McGuire; Ijaz A Cheema; Liza McLornan; James C Forde
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; Glenn M Preminger; Evan R Goldfischer; Amy E Krambeck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Intraoperative patient selection for tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Kyu Hyun Kim; Man Deuk Kim; Doo Yong Chung; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

10.  Effect of endourological procedures on erectile function: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ashraf Mosharafa; Mahmoud Abd El Hamid; Mohamed Tawfik; Omar Abd El Rzzak
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.