Literature DB >> 26893663

α1-blockers for the reduction of ureteric stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peng Zhang1, Wan-Li Hu1, Bei Cheng2, Long Cheng1, Yang-Jun Zeng1, Gang Wang1.   

Abstract

The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the current evidence for the use of α1-blockers in relieving ureteric stent-related symptoms (USS). Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, were searched and two independent reviewers identified relevant parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs), assessed trial quality and extracted data. Review Manager (version 5.2) was used to conduct a meta-analysis of the data. Significant advantages were demonstrated in the treatment group based on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), voiding symptom sub-scores [mean difference (MD), -2.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), (-4.36, -0.96)], Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) urinary symptoms score (MD, -5.84; 95%CI, -9.35 to -2.33), IPSS quality of life score (MD, -1.46; 95%CI, -2.64 to -0.28) USSQ quality of life score (MD, -0.69; 95%CI, -1.10 to -0.28), USSQ pain score (MD, -3.97; 95%CI, -5.52 to -2.42), Visual Analog Pain Scale (MD, -1.53; 95%CI, -2.25 to -0.80) and USSQ general health score (MD, -1.82; 95%CI, -2.47 to -1.18). No significant differences were detected from the following results: IPSS storage symptom sub-score (MD, -0.93; 95%CI, -2.28 to 0.43), USSQ sexual matters score (MD, -0.10; 95%CI, -0.79 to 0.59), USSQ work performance score (MD, 1.64; 95%CI, -2.18 to 5.47) and USSQ additional problems score (MD, -2.02; 95%CI, -4.55 to 0.52). However, significant between-trial heterogeneity was detected following statistical analysis and there were insufficient data to trace its source. The existing RCT data supported the hypothesis that α1-blockers beneficially influence pain, urinary symptoms and the quality of life of patients with an indwelling ureteral stent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  quality of life; ureteral stent; α1-blockers

Year:  2015        PMID: 26893663      PMCID: PMC4733953          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  34 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data.

Authors:  Natasha Wiebe; Ben Vandermeer; Robert W Platt; Terry P Klassen; David Moher; Nicholas J Barrowman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  A novel drug eluting ureteral stent: a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a ketorolac loaded ureteral stent.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Robert S Walsh; John D Denstedt; Glenn M Preminger; Jamie Li; John C Evans; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Meta-analysis showing the beneficial effect of α-blockers on ureteric stent discomfort.

Authors:  Alastair D Lamb; Sarah L Vowler; Richard Johnston; Nick Dunn; Oliver J Wiseman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Effects of tamsulosin, solifenacin, and combination therapy for the treatment of ureteral stent related discomforts.

Authors:  Kyoung Taek Lim; Yong Tae Kim; Tchun Yong Lee; Sung Yul Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-07-24

5.  [Tamsulosin administration for prophylaxis and treatment of stent-related symptoms].

Authors:  A G Martov; V A Maksimov; D V Ergakov; V M Miroshnikov; F R Asfandiiarov; E S Kalashnikov
Journal:  Urologiia       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

6.  The effect of ureteral stent placement on post-ureteroscopy complications: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Bruce J Trock; Mohamad E Allaf; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Effects of specific alpha-1A/1D blocker on lower urinary tract symptoms due to double-J stent: a prospectively randomized study.

Authors:  Chung-Jing Wang; Shi-Wei Huang; Chien-Hsing Chang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-03-10

8.  The effects of tolterodine extended release and alfuzosin for the treatment of double-j stent-related symptoms.

Authors:  Seung Chol Park; Sung Won Jung; Jea Whan Lee; Joung Sik Rim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  A prospective evaluation of pain associated with stone passage, stents, and stent removal using a visual analog scale.

Authors:  Franklin E Kuehhas; Arkadus Miernik; Varun Sharma; Sabina Sevcenco; Elchin Javadli; Ralf Herwig; Tibor Szarvas; Martin Schoenthaler; Georg Schatzl; Peter Weibl
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Stent positioning after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi: the question is still open.

Authors:  Rocco Damiano; Riccardo Autorino; Ciro Esposito; Francesco Cantiello; Rosario Sacco; Marco de Sio; Massimo D'Armiento
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of Tamsulosin and Tolterodine on double J stent-related symptoms: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Mahmoudreza Moradi; Hossein Abdi; Sina Ebrahimi; Haress Rezaee; Kaveh Kaseb
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-02-28

2.  PRISMA-combined α-blockers and antimuscarinics for ureteral stent-related symptoms: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Ming Zhang; Pei Chu; Wen-Jin Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Office-based ureteric stent removal is achievable, improves clinical flexibility and quality of care, whilst also keeping surgeons close to their patients.

Authors:  Emma Louise Baston; Sophie Wellum; Zosia Bredow; Guy Storey; Anne Palmer; David van Dellen; Ben R Grey
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2018-03-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.