BACKGROUND: Multiplex arrays are increasingly used for measuring protein biomarkers. Advantages of this approach include specimen conservation, limited sample handling, and decreased time and cost, but the challenges of optimizing assay format for each protein, selecting common dilution factors, and establishing robust quality control algorithms are substantial. Here, we use measurements of 15 protein biomarkers from a large study to illustrate processing, analytic, and quality control issues with multiplexed immunoassays. METHODS: We contracted with ThermoScientific for duplicate measurements of 15 proteins in 2322 participants from a community-based cohort, a plasma control, and recombinant protein controls using 2 custom planar microarrays with 6 (panel A) or 9 (panel B) capture antibodies printed in each well. We selected constituent analytes in each panel based on endogenous concentrations and assay availability. Protocols were standardized for sample processing, storage, and freeze-thaw exposures. We analyzed data for effects of deviations from processing protocols, precision, and bias. RESULTS: Measurements were within reportable ranges for each of the assays; however, concentrations for 7 of the 15 proteins were not centered on the dose-response curves. An additional freeze-thaw cycle and erroneous sample dilution for a subset of samples produced significantly different results. Measurements with large differences between duplicates were seen to cluster by analyte, plate, and participant. Conventional univariate quality control algorithms rejected many plates. Plate-specific medians of cohort and plasma control data significantly covaried, an observation important for development of alternative quality control algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplex measurements present difficult challenges that require further analytical and statistical developments.
BACKGROUND: Multiplex arrays are increasingly used for measuring protein biomarkers. Advantages of this approach include specimen conservation, limited sample handling, and decreased time and cost, but the challenges of optimizing assay format for each protein, selecting common dilution factors, and establishing robust quality control algorithms are substantial. Here, we use measurements of 15 protein biomarkers from a large study to illustrate processing, analytic, and quality control issues with multiplexed immunoassays. METHODS: We contracted with ThermoScientific for duplicate measurements of 15 proteins in 2322 participants from a community-based cohort, a plasma control, and recombinant protein controls using 2 custom planar microarrays with 6 (panel A) or 9 (panel B) capture antibodies printed in each well. We selected constituent analytes in each panel based on endogenous concentrations and assay availability. Protocols were standardized for sample processing, storage, and freeze-thaw exposures. We analyzed data for effects of deviations from processing protocols, precision, and bias. RESULTS: Measurements were within reportable ranges for each of the assays; however, concentrations for 7 of the 15 proteins were not centered on the dose-response curves. An additional freeze-thaw cycle and erroneous sample dilution for a subset of samples produced significantly different results. Measurements with large differences between duplicates were seen to cluster by analyte, plate, and participant. Conventional univariate quality control algorithms rejected many plates. Plate-specific medians of cohort and plasma control data significantly covaried, an observation important for development of alternative quality control algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplex measurements present difficult challenges that require further analytical and statistical developments.
Authors: J W Findlay; W C Smith; J W Lee; G D Nordblom; I Das; B S DeSilva; M N Khan; R R Bowsher Journal: J Pharm Biomed Anal Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 3.935
Authors: Harvey B Pollard; Meera Srivastava; Ofer Eidelman; Catherine Jozwik; Stephen W Rothwell; Gregory P Mueller; David M Jacobowitz; Thomas Darling; William B Guggino; Jerry Wright; Pamela L Zeitlin; Cloud P Paweletz Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2007-08-10 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Shawn C Baker; Steven R Bauer; Richard P Beyer; James D Brenton; Bud Bromley; John Burrill; Helen Causton; Michael P Conley; Rosalie Elespuru; Michael Fero; Carole Foy; James Fuscoe; Xiaolian Gao; David Lee Gerhold; Patrick Gilles; Federico Goodsaid; Xu Guo; Joe Hackett; Richard D Hockett; Pranvera Ikonomi; Rafael A Irizarry; Ernest S Kawasaki; Tamma Kaysser-Kranich; Kathleen Kerr; Gretchen Kiser; Walter H Koch; Kathy Y Lee; Chunmei Liu; Z Lewis Liu; Anne Lucas; Chitra F Manohar; Garry Miyada; Zora Modrusan; Helen Parkes; Raj K Puri; Laura Reid; Thomas B Ryder; Marc Salit; Raymond R Samaha; Uwe Scherf; Timothy J Sendera; Robert A Setterquist; Leming Shi; Richard Shippy; Jesus V Soriano; Elizabeth A Wagar; Janet A Warrington; Mickey Williams; Frederike Wilmer; Mike Wilson; Paul K Wolber; Xiaoning Wu; Renata Zadro Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Leming Shi; Laura H Reid; Wendell D Jones; Richard Shippy; Janet A Warrington; Shawn C Baker; Patrick J Collins; Francoise de Longueville; Ernest S Kawasaki; Kathleen Y Lee; Yuling Luo; Yongming Andrew Sun; James C Willey; Robert A Setterquist; Gavin M Fischer; Weida Tong; Yvonne P Dragan; David J Dix; Felix W Frueh; Frederico M Goodsaid; Damir Herman; Roderick V Jensen; Charles D Johnson; Edward K Lobenhofer; Raj K Puri; Uwe Schrf; Jean Thierry-Mieg; Charles Wang; Mike Wilson; Paul K Wolber; Lu Zhang; Shashi Amur; Wenjun Bao; Catalin C Barbacioru; Anne Bergstrom Lucas; Vincent Bertholet; Cecilie Boysen; Bud Bromley; Donna Brown; Alan Brunner; Roger Canales; Xiaoxi Megan Cao; Thomas A Cebula; James J Chen; Jing Cheng; Tzu-Ming Chu; Eugene Chudin; John Corson; J Christopher Corton; Lisa J Croner; Christopher Davies; Timothy S Davison; Glenda Delenstarr; Xutao Deng; David Dorris; Aron C Eklund; Xiao-hui Fan; Hong Fang; Stephanie Fulmer-Smentek; James C Fuscoe; Kathryn Gallagher; Weigong Ge; Lei Guo; Xu Guo; Janet Hager; Paul K Haje; Jing Han; Tao Han; Heather C Harbottle; Stephen C Harris; Eli Hatchwell; Craig A Hauser; Susan Hester; Huixiao Hong; Patrick Hurban; Scott A Jackson; Hanlee Ji; Charles R Knight; Winston P Kuo; J Eugene LeClerc; Shawn Levy; Quan-Zhen Li; Chunmei Liu; Ying Liu; Michael J Lombardi; Yunqing Ma; Scott R Magnuson; Botoul Maqsodi; Tim McDaniel; Nan Mei; Ola Myklebost; Baitang Ning; Natalia Novoradovskaya; Michael S Orr; Terry W Osborn; Adam Papallo; Tucker A Patterson; Roger G Perkins; Elizabeth H Peters; Ron Peterson; Kenneth L Philips; P Scott Pine; Lajos Pusztai; Feng Qian; Hongzu Ren; Mitch Rosen; Barry A Rosenzweig; Raymond R Samaha; Mark Schena; Gary P Schroth; Svetlana Shchegrova; Dave D Smith; Frank Staedtler; Zhenqiang Su; Hongmei Sun; Zoltan Szallasi; Zivana Tezak; Danielle Thierry-Mieg; Karol L Thompson; Irina Tikhonova; Yaron Turpaz; Beena Vallanat; Christophe Van; Stephen J Walker; Sue Jane Wang; Yonghong Wang; Russ Wolfinger; Alex Wong; Jie Wu; Chunlin Xiao; Qian Xie; Jun Xu; Wen Yang; Liang Zhang; Sheng Zhong; Yaping Zong; William Slikker Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend Journal: Nature Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Michael Liew; Matthew C Groll; James E Thompson; Sara L Call; Joann E Moser; Justin D Hoopes; Karl Voelkerding; Carl Wittwer; Rex S Spendlove Journal: Biotechniques Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 1.993
Authors: Julie A Bastarache; Tatsuki Koyama; Nancy E Wickersham; Daphne B Mitchell; Ray L Mernaugh; Lorraine B Ware Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Margo R Monroe; Alexander P Reddington; Austin D Collins; Craig LaBoda; Marina Cretich; Marcella Chiari; Frédéric F Little; M Selim Unlü Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Xiaoyan Zhao; Ferhan Qureshi; P Scott Eastman; William C Manning; Claire Alexander; William H Robinson; Lyndal K Hesterberg Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Charles X Kim; Kent R Bailey; George G Klee; Allison A Ellington; Guanghui Liu; Thomas H Mosley; Hamid Rehman; Iftikhar J Kullo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 3.240