Literature DB >> 22366959

Pre-analytical effects of blood sampling and handling in quantitative immunoassays for rheumatoid arthritis.

Xiaoyan Zhao1, Ferhan Qureshi, P Scott Eastman, William C Manning, Claire Alexander, William H Robinson, Lyndal K Hesterberg.   

Abstract

Variability in pre-analytical blood sampling and handling can significantly impact results obtained in quantitative immunoassays. Understanding the impact of these variables is critical for accurate quantification and validation of biomarker measurements. Particularly, in the design and execution of large clinical trials, even small differences in sample processing and handling can have dramatic effects in analytical reliability, results interpretation, trial management and outcome. The effects of two common blood sampling methods (serum vs. plasma) and two widely-used serum handling methods (on the clot with ambient temperature shipping, "traditional", vs. centrifuged with cold chain shipping, "protocol") on protein and autoantibody concentrations were examined. Matched serum and plasma samples were collected from 32 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients representing a wide range of disease activity status. Additionally, a set of matched serum samples with two sample handling methods was collected. One tube was processed per manufacturer's instructions and shipped overnight on cold packs (protocol). The matched tube, without prior centrifugation, was simultaneously shipped overnight at ambient temperatures (traditional). Upon delivery, the traditional tube was centrifuged. All samples were subsequently aliquoted and frozen prior to analysis of protein and autoantibody biomarkers. Median correlation between paired serum and plasma across all autoantibody assays was 0.99 (0.98-1.00) with a median % difference of -3.3 (-7.5 to 6.0). In contrast, observed protein biomarker concentrations were significantly affected by sample types, with median correlation of 0.99 (0.33-1.00) and a median % difference of -10 (-55 to 23). When the two serum collection/handling methods were compared, the median correlation between paired samples for autoantibodies was 0.99 (0.91-1.00) with a median difference of 4%. In contrast, significant increases were observed in protein biomarker concentrations among certain biomarkers in samples processed with the 'traditional' method. Autoantibody quantification appears robust to both sample type (plasma vs. serum) and pre-analytical sample collection/handling methods (protocol vs. traditional). In contrast, for non-antibody protein biomarker concentrations, sample type had a significant impact; plasma samples generally exhibit decreased protein biomarker concentrations relative to serum. Similarly, sample handling significantly impacted the variability of protein biomarker concentrations. When biomarker concentrations are combined algorithmically into a single test score such as a multi-biomarker disease activity test for rheumatoid arthritis (MBDA), changes in protein biomarker concentrations may result in a bias of the score. These results illustrate the importance of characterizing pre-analytical methodology, sample type, sample processing and handling procedures for clinical testing in order to ensure test accuracy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22366959      PMCID: PMC3404505          DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  29 in total

Review 1.  C-reactive protein: a critical update.

Authors:  Mark B Pepys; Gideon M Hirschfield
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Comparison of serum and heparinized plasma samples for measurement of chemistry analytes.

Authors:  Rodney R Miles; Richard F Roberts; Angelica R Putnam; William L Roberts
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  Serum amyloid A, the major vertebrate acute-phase reactant.

Authors:  C M Uhlar; A S Whitehead
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1999-10

4.  Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M L Prevoo; M A van 't Hof; H H Kuper; M A van Leeuwen; L B van de Putte; P L van Riel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1995-01

5.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1988-03

6.  Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide and IgA rheumatoid factor predict the development of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist; Ben A W de Jong; Ewa Berglin; Göran Hallmans; Göran Wadell; Hans Stenlund; Ulf Sundin; Walther J van Venrooij
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-10

7.  Radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term prospective study of 109 patients.

Authors:  N A Graudal; A G Jurik; A de Carvalho; H K Graudal
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-08

8.  Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Catriona Grigor; Hilary Capell; Anne Stirling; Alex D McMahon; Peter Lock; Ramsay Vallance; Wilma Kincaid; Duncan Porter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Jul 17-23       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Direct expression cloning of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, a cytokine-induced endothelial protein that binds to lymphocytes.

Authors:  L Osborn; C Hession; R Tizard; C Vassallo; S Luhowskyj; G Chi-Rosso; R Lobb
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-12-22       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Multiplex, megaplex, index, and complex: the present and future of laboratory diagnostics in rheumatology.

Authors:  Mark H Wener
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Mass spectrometry based biomarker discovery, verification, and validation--quality assurance and control of protein biomarker assays.

Authors:  Carol E Parker; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Correlation of the Multi-Biomarker Disease Activity Score With Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tate M Johnson; Kyle A Register; Cynthia M Schmidt; James R O'Dell; Ted R Mikuls; Kaleb Michaud; Bryant R England
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of preanalytical factors and methodological differences influencing the measurement of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor.

Authors:  Ulrika Sjöbom; Anders K Nilsson; Hanna Gyllensten; Ann Hellström; Chatarina Löfqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Plasma degradome affected by variable storage of human blood.

Authors:  Leon F A van Dullemen; Marie-Laëtitia Thézénas; Rutger J Ploeg; Benedikt M Kessler; Maria Kaisar; M Zeeshan Akhtar; Honglei Huang; Sandrine Rendel; Philip D Charles; Roman Fischer
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.988

5.  Clinical validation of a blood-based classifier for diagnostic evaluation of asymptomatic individuals with pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Charles E Birse; Jennifer L Tomic; Harvey I Pass; William N Rom; Robert J Lagier
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.988

6.  Best practice recommendations for the measurement and interpretation of salivary proinflammatory cytokines in biobehavioral research.

Authors:  Jenna L Riis; Hedyeh Ahmadi; Katrina R Hamilton; Tracey Hand; Douglas A Granger
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 7.217

7.  Plasma processing conditions substantially influence circulating microRNA biomarker levels.

Authors:  Heather H Cheng; Hye Son Yi; Yeonju Kim; Evan M Kroh; Jason W Chien; Keith D Eaton; Marc T Goodman; Jonathan F Tait; Muneesh Tewari; Colin C Pritchard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity test on clinical practice.

Authors:  John W Peabody; Vibeke Strand; Riti Shimkhada; Rachel Lee; David Chernoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Cytokines as biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Agata Burska; Marjorie Boissinot; Frederique Ponchel
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 4.711

10.  Plasma protein absolute quantification by nano-LC Q-TOF UDMSE for clinical biomarker verification.

Authors:  Maria Ilies; Cristina Adela Iuga; Felicia Loghin; Vishnu Mukund Dhople; Elke Hammer
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2017-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.