Literature DB >> 27663477

Translating pharmacodynamic biomarkers from bench to bedside: analytical validation and fit-for-purpose studies to qualify multiplex immunofluorescent assays for use on clinical core biopsy specimens.

Allison Marrero1, Scott Lawrence1, Deborah Wilsker1, Andrea Regier Voth1, Robert J Kinders2.   

Abstract

Multiplex pharmacodynamic (PD) assays have the potential to increase sensitivity of biomarker-based reporting for new targeted agents, as well as revealing significantly more information about target and pathway activation than single-biomarker PD assays. Stringent methodology is required to ensure reliable and reproducible results. Common to all PD assays is the importance of reagent validation, assay and instrument calibration, and the determination of suitable response calibrators; however, multiplex assays, particularly those performed on paraffin specimens from tissue blocks, bring format-specific challenges adding a layer of complexity to assay development. We discuss existing multiplex approaches and the development of a multiplex immunofluorescence assay measuring DNA damage and DNA repair enzymes in response to anti-cancer therapeutics and describe how our novel method addresses known issues.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assay validation; Cancer drug; Clinical samples; Fitness-for-purpose; Multiplex assay; Targeted therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27663477      PMCID: PMC5065024          DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2016.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  30 in total

1.  Constitution and quantity of lysis buffer alters outcome of reverse phase protein microarrays.

Authors:  Mary Winters; Bhavana Dabir; Minshu Yu; Elise C Kohn
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  ATR and H2AX cooperate in maintaining genome stability under replication stress.

Authors:  Rebecca A Chanoux; Bu Yin; Karen A Urtishak; Amma Asare; Craig H Bassing; Eric J Brown
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Evaluation of reverse phase protein array (RPPA)-based pathway-activation profiling in 84 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines as platform for cancer proteomics and biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Ramesh Ummanni; Heiko A Mannsperger; Johanna Sonntag; Marcus Oswald; Ashwini K Sharma; Rainer König; Ulrike Korf
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-12-19

4.  Phase II evaluation of IPI-926, an oral Hedgehog inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Koji Sasaki; Jason R Gotlib; Ruben A Mesa; Kate J Newberry; Farhad Ravandi; Jorge E Cortes; Patrick Kelly; Jeffery L Kutok; Hagop M Kantarjian; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2015-02-17

5.  First-in-human phase I study of the liposomal RNA interference therapeutic Atu027 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Beate Schultheis; Dirk Strumberg; Ansgar Santel; Christiane Vank; Frank Gebhardt; Oliver Keil; Christian Lange; Klaus Giese; Jörg Kaufmann; Michael Khan; Joachim Drevs
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Realizing the promise of reverse phase protein arrays for clinical, translational, and basic research: a workshop report: the RPPA (Reverse Phase Protein Array) society.

Authors:  Rehan Akbani; Karl-Friedrich Becker; Neil Carragher; Ted Goldstein; Leanne de Koning; Ulrike Korf; Lance Liotta; Gordon B Mills; Satoshi S Nishizuka; Michael Pawlak; Emanuel F Petricoin; Harvey B Pollard; Bryan Serrels; Jingchun Zhu
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Effect of a Smac Mimetic (TL32711, Birinapant) on the Apoptotic Program and Apoptosis Biomarkers Examined with Validated Multiplex Immunoassays Fit for Clinical Use.

Authors:  Apurva K Srivastava; Soumya Jaganathan; Laurie Stephen; Melinda G Hollingshead; Adam Layhee; Eric Damour; Jeevan Prasaad Govindharajulu; Jennifer Donohue; Dominic Esposito; James P Mapes; Robert J Kinders; Naoko Takebe; Joseph E Tomaszewski; Shivaani Kummar; James H Doroshow; Ralph E Parchment
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Reverse-phase protein array analysis to identify biomarker proteins in human pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Jing Huang; Marsha L Frazier; Nianxiang Zhang; Qian Liu; Chongjuan Wei
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway correlates with prognosis in stage II colon cancer.

Authors:  K Malinowsky; U Nitsche; K-P Janssen; F G Bader; C Späth; E Drecoll; G Keller; H Höfler; J Slotta-Huspenina; K-F Becker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Phase II study evaluating 2 dosing schedules of oral foretinib (GSK1363089), cMET/VEGFR2 inhibitor, in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Authors:  Manish A Shah; Zev A Wainberg; Daniel V T Catenacci; Howard S Hochster; James Ford; Pamela Kunz; Fa-Chyi Lee; Howard Kallender; Fabiola Cecchi; Daniel C Rabe; Harold Keer; Anne-Marie Martin; Yuan Liu; Robert Gagnon; Peter Bonate; Li Liu; Tona Gilmer; Donald P Bottaro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.752

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of Pharmacodynamic Responses to Cancer Therapeutic Agents Using DNA Damage Markers.

Authors:  Deborah F Wilsker; Allison M Barrett; Angie B Dull; Scott M Lawrence; Melinda G Hollingshead; Alice Chen; Shivaani Kummar; Ralph E Parchment; James H Doroshow; Robert J Kinders
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  From the Broad Phase II Trial to Precision Oncology: A Perspective on the Origins of Basket and Umbrella Clinical Trial Designs in Cancer Drug Development.

Authors:  Deborah B Doroshow; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

3.  The Challenge for Development of Valuable Immuno-oncology Biomarkers.

Authors:  Janice M Mehnert; Arta M Monjazeb; Johanna M T Beerthuijzen; Deborah Collyar; Larry Rubinstein; Lyndsay N Harris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  A manual multiplex immunofluorescence method for investigating neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Alexander J Ehrenberg; Dulce Ovando Morales; Antonia M H Piergies; Song Hua Li; Jorge Santos Tejedor; Mihovil Mladinov; Jan Mulder; Lea T Grinberg
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Shortwave infrared emitting multicolored nanoprobes for biomarker-specific cancer imaging in vivo.

Authors:  Harini Kantamneni; Shravani Barkund; Michael Donzanti; Daniel Martin; Xinyu Zhao; Shuqing He; Richard E Riman; Mei Chee Tan; Mark C Pierce; Charles M Roth; Vidya Ganapathy; Prabhas V Moghe
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Fit-For-Purpose PD-L1 Biomarker Testing For Patient Selection in Immuno-Oncology: Guidelines For Clinical Laboratories From the Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association Canadienne Des Pathologistes (CAP-ACP).

Authors:  Carol C Cheung; Penny Barnes; Gilbert Bigras; Scott Boerner; Jagdish Butany; Fiorella Calabrese; Christian Couture; Jean Deschenes; Hala El-Zimaity; Gabor Fischer; Pierre O Fiset; John Garratt; Laurette Geldenhuys; C Blake Gilks; Marius Ilie; Diana Ionescu; Hyun J Lim; Lisa Manning; Adnan Mansoor; Robert Riddell; Catherine Ross; Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Alan Spatz; Paul E Swanson; Victor A Tron; Ming-Sound Tsao; Hangjun Wang; Zhaolin Xu; Emina E Torlakovic
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.