Literature DB >> 19357335

A feedback model explains the differential scaling of human postural responses to perturbation acceleration and velocity.

Torrence D J Welch1, Lena H Ting.   

Abstract

Although the neural basis of balance control remains unknown, recent studies suggest that a feedback law on center-of-mass (CoM) kinematics determines the temporal patterning of muscle activity during human postural responses. We hypothesized that the same feedback law would also explain variations in muscle activity to support-surface translation as perturbation characteristics vary. Subject CoM motion was experimentally modulated using 34 different anterior-posterior support-surface translations of varying peak acceleration and velocity but the same total displacement. Electromyographic (EMG) recordings from several muscles of the lower limbs and trunk were compared to predicted EMG patterns from an inverted pendulum model under delayed feedback control. In both recorded and predicted EMG patterns, the initial burst of muscle activity scaled linearly with peak acceleration, whereas the tonic "plateau" region scaled with peak velocity. The relatively invariant duration of the initial burst was modeled by incorporating a transient, time-limited encoding of CoM acceleration inspired by muscle spindle primary afferent dynamic responses. The entire time course of recorded and predicted muscle activity compared favorably across all conditions, suggesting that the initial burst of muscle activity is not generated by feedforward neural mechanisms. Perturbation conditions were presented randomly and subjects maintained relatively constant feedback gains across all conditions. In contrast, an optimal feedback solution based on a trade-off between CoM stabilization and energy expenditure predicted that feedback gains should change with perturbation characteristics. These results suggest that an invariant feedback law was used to generate the entire time course of muscle activity across a variety of postural disturbances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19357335      PMCID: PMC2694108          DOI: 10.1152/jn.90775.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  73 in total

1.  Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques.

Authors:  C F Runge; C L Shupert; F B Horak; F E Zajac
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Postural control model interpretation of stabilogram diffusion analysis.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Ratio of shear to load ground-reaction force may underlie the directional tuning of the automatic postural response to rotation and translation.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; Jane M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Properties of synergies arising from a theory of optimal motor behavior.

Authors:  Manu Chhabra; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Postural responses evoked by platform pertubations are dominated by continuous feedback.

Authors:  Herman van der Kooij; Erwin de Vlugt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  [Pro and contra on the acceleration sensitivity of muscle spindles].

Authors:  H D Henatsch
Journal:  Bull Schweiz Akad Med Wiss       Date:  1971-09

8.  Control of grip force during restraint of an object held between finger and thumb: responses of cutaneous afferents from the digits.

Authors:  V G Macefield; C Häger-Ross; R S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neck, trunk and limb muscle responses during postural perturbations in humans.

Authors:  E A Keshner; M H Woollacott; B Debu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Changes in size of the stretch reflex of cat and man attributed to aftereffects in muscle spindles.

Authors:  J E Gregory; D L Morgan; U Proske
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  42 in total

1.  Dissociation of muscle and cortical response scaling to balance perturbation acceleration.

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Greg Hajcak; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Task-level feedback can explain temporal recruitment of spatially fixed muscle synergies throughout postural perturbations.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Force encoding in stick insect legs delineates a reference frame for motor control.

Authors:  Sasha N Zill; Josef Schmitz; Sumaiya Chaudhry; Ansgar Büschges
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Long-latency muscle activity reflects continuous, delayed sensorimotor feedback of task-level and not joint-level error.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neuromechanical tuning of nonlinear postural control dynamics.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; Keith W van Antwerp; Jevin E Scrivens; J Lucas McKay; Torrence D J Welch; Jeffrey T Bingham; Stephen P DeWeerth
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.642

6.  Stability in a frontal plane model of balance requires coupled changes to postural configuration and neural feedback control.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Bingham; Julia T Choi; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Vestibular and corticospinal control of human body orientation in the gravitational field.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Statistically significant contrasts between EMG waveforms revealed using wavelet-based functional ANOVA.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Torrence D J Welch; Brani Vidakovic; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Balance, Body Motion, and Muscle Activity After High-Volume Short-Term Dance-Based Rehabilitation in Persons With Parkinson Disease: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Lena H Ting; Madeleine E Hackney
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  Postural strategies assessed with inertial sensors in healthy and parkinsonian subjects.

Authors:  Chiara Baston; Martina Mancini; Bernadette Schoneburg; Fay Horak; Laura Rocchi
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 2.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.