Literature DB >> 17460106

Postural responses evoked by platform pertubations are dominated by continuous feedback.

Herman van der Kooij1, Erwin de Vlugt.   

Abstract

Is human balance control dominated by time invariant continuous feedback mechanisms or do noncontinuous mechanisms play a significant role like intermittent control? The goal of this paper is to quantify how much of the postural responses evoked by pseudorandom external periodic perturbations can be explained by continuous time invariant feedback control. Nine healthy subjects participated in this study. Center of mass and ankle torque responses were elicited by periodic platform perturbations in forward-backward directions containing energy in the 0.06- to 4.5-Hz frequency band. Subjects had their eyes open (EO) or eyes closed (EC). Responses were decomposed into a periodic component and a remnant (stochastic) component using spectral analysis. It is concluded that periodic responses can explain most of the evoked responses, although the remnant power spectral densities (PSDs) were significant especially for slow responses (<0.2 Hz) and largest for EC. The found remnant PSD did depend on the sensory condition but not on the platform perturbation amplitude. The ratio of the body sway and ankle torque remnant PSD reflects the body dynamics. Both findings are consistent with the idea that estimation of body orientation is part of a continuous feedback loop and that (stochastic) estimation errors increase when one source of sensory information is removed. The findings are not consistent with the idea that discrete or discontinuous intermittent feedback mechanisms significantly shape postural responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17460106     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00457.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Recruitment of motor units in the medial gastrocnemius muscle during human quiet standing: is recruitment intermittent? What triggers recruitment?

Authors:  Taian M M Vieira; Ian D Loram; Silvia Muceli; Roberto Merletti; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Task-level feedback can explain temporal recruitment of spatially fixed muscle synergies throughout postural perturbations.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Changes in sensory reweighting of proprioceptive information during standing balance with age and disease.

Authors:  J H Pasma; D Engelhart; A B Maier; A C Schouten; H van der Kooij; C G M Meskers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Long-latency muscle activity reflects continuous, delayed sensorimotor feedback of task-level and not joint-level error.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Human control of an inverted pendulum: is continuous control necessary? Is intermittent control effective? Is intermittent control physiological?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Henrik Gollee; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  A feedback model explains the differential scaling of human postural responses to perturbation acceleration and velocity.

Authors:  Torrence D J Welch; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Visual control of stable and unstable loads: what is the feedback delay and extent of linear time-invariant control?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Identification of neural feedback for upright stance in humans: stabilization rather than sway minimization.

Authors:  Tim Kiemel; Yuanfen Zhang; John J Jeka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Sensorimotor feedback based on task-relevant error robustly predicts temporal recruitment and multidirectional tuning of muscle synergies.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Potential roles of force cues in human stance control.

Authors:  Christian Cnyrim; Thomas Mergner; Christoph Maurer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.