Chiara Baston1, Martina Mancini2, Bernadette Schoneburg2, Fay Horak2, Laura Rocchi3. 1. Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: chiara.baston@unibo.it. 2. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA(1). 3. Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The present study introduces a novel instrumented method to characterize postural movement strategies to maintain balance during stance (ankle and hip strategy), by means of inertial sensors, positioned on the legs and on the trunk. We evaluated postural strategies in subjects with 2 types of Parkinsonism: idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), and in age-matched control subjects standing under perturbed conditions implemented by the Sensory Organization Test (SOT). Coordination between the upper and lower segments of the body during postural sway was measured using a covariance index over time, by a sliding-window algorithm. Afterwards, a postural strategy index was computed. We also measured the amount of postural sway, as adjunctive information to characterize balance, by the root mean square of the horizontal trunk acceleration signal (RMS). RESULTS: showed that control subjects were able to change their postural strategy, whilst PSP and PD subjects persisted in use of an ankle strategy in all conditions. PD subjects had RMS values similar to control subjects even without changing postural strategy appropriately, whereas PSP subjects showed much larger RMS values than controls, resulting in several falls during the most challenging SOT conditions (5 and 6). Results are in accordance with the corresponding clinical literature describing postural behavior in the same kind of subjects. The proposed strategy index, based on the use of inertial sensors on the upper and lower body segments, is a promising and unobtrusive tool to characterize postural strategies performed to attain balance.
UNLABELLED: The present study introduces a novel instrumented method to characterize postural movement strategies to maintain balance during stance (ankle and hip strategy), by means of inertial sensors, positioned on the legs and on the trunk. We evaluated postural strategies in subjects with 2 types of Parkinsonism: idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), and in age-matched control subjects standing under perturbed conditions implemented by the Sensory Organization Test (SOT). Coordination between the upper and lower segments of the body during postural sway was measured using a covariance index over time, by a sliding-window algorithm. Afterwards, a postural strategy index was computed. We also measured the amount of postural sway, as adjunctive information to characterize balance, by the root mean square of the horizontal trunk acceleration signal (RMS). RESULTS: showed that control subjects were able to change their postural strategy, whilst PSP and PD subjects persisted in use of an ankle strategy in all conditions. PD subjects had RMS values similar to control subjects even without changing postural strategy appropriately, whereas PSP subjects showed much larger RMS values than controls, resulting in several falls during the most challenging SOT conditions (5 and 6). Results are in accordance with the corresponding clinical literature describing postural behavior in the same kind of subjects. The proposed strategy index, based on the use of inertial sensors on the upper and lower body segments, is a promising and unobtrusive tool to characterize postural strategies performed to attain balance.
Authors: A Zwergal; C la Fougère; S Lorenzl; A Rominger; G Xiong; L Deutschenbaur; J Linn; S Krafczyk; M Dieterich; T Brandt; M Strupp; P Bartenstein; K Jahn Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S L Whitney; J L Roche; G F Marchetti; C-C Lin; D P Steed; G R Furman; M C Musolino; M S Redfern Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Blake K Scanlon; Bonnie E Levin; Daniel A Nation; Heather L Katzen; Alexandra Guevara-Salcedo; Carlos Singer; Spiridon Papapetropoulos Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Silvia Del Din; Alan Godfrey; Shirley Coleman; Brook Galna; Sue Lord; Lynn Rochester Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2015-06-07 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Peter C Fino; Fay B Horak; Mahmoud El-Gohary; Carolyn Guidarelli; Mary E Medysky; Sarah J Nagle; Kerri M Winters-Stone Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Farwa Ali; Stacy R Loushin; Hugo Botha; Keith A Josephs; Jennifer L Whitwell; Kenton Kaufman Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 4.553