| Literature DB >> 19353598 |
Xin Zhang1, Ruibo Wu, Lingchun Song, Yuchun Lin, Menghai Lin, Zexing Cao, Wei Wu, Yirong Mo.
Abstract
Combined QM(PM3)/MM molecular dynamics simulations together with QM(DFT)/MM optimizations for key configurations have been performed to elucidate the enzymatic catalysis mechanism on the detoxification of paraoxon by phosphotriesterase (PTE). In the simulations, the PM3 parameters for the phosphorous atom were reoptimized. The equilibrated configuration of the enzyme/substrate complex showed that paraoxon can strongly bind to the more solvent-exposed metal ion Zn(beta), but the free energy profile along the binding path demonstrated that the binding is thermodynamically unfavorable. This explains why the crystal structures of PTE with substrate analogues often exhibit long distances between the phosphoral oxygen and Zn(beta). The subsequent SN2 reaction plays the key role in the whole process, but controversies exist over the identity of the nucleophilic species, which could be either a hydroxide ion terminally coordinated to Zn(alpha) or the micro-hydroxo bridge between the alpha- and beta-metals. Our simulations supported the latter and showed that the rate-limiting step is the distortion of the bound paraoxon to approach the bridging hydroxide. After this preparation step, the bridging hydroxide ion attacks the phosphorous center and replaces the diethyl phosphate with a low barrier. Thus, a plausible way to engineer PTE with enhanced catalytic activity is to stabilize the deformed paraoxon. Conformational analyses indicate that Trp131 is the closest residue to the phosphoryl oxygen, and mutations to Arg or Gln or even Lys, which can shorten the hydrogen bond distance with the phosphoryl oxygen, could potentially lead to a mutant with enhanced activity for the detoxification of organophosphates. Copyright 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19353598 PMCID: PMC2754597 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21238
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Comput Chem ISSN: 0192-8651 Impact factor: 3.376