| Literature DB >> 31878010 |
Monique Cardozo1,2, Joyce S F D de Almeida3, Samir F de A Cavalcante1,2,4, Jacqueline R S Salgado2, Arlan S Gonçalves5,6, Tanos C C França3,4, Kamil Kuca4, Humberto R Bizzo1.
Abstract
Organophosphorus compounds (OP) are chemicals widely used as pesticides in different applications such as agriculture and public health (vector control), and some of the highly toxic forms have been used as chemical weapons. After application of OPs in an environment, they persist for a period, suffering a degradation process where the biotic factors are considered the most relevant forms. However, to date, the biodegradation of OP compounds is not well understood. There are a plenty of structure-based biodegradation estimation methods, but none of them consider enzymatic interaction in predicting and better comprehending the differences in the fate of OPs in the environment. It is well known that enzymatic processes are the most relevant processes in biodegradation, and that hydrolysis is the main pathway in the natural elimination of OPs in soil samples. Due to this, we carried out theoretical studies in order to investigate the interactions of these OPs with a chosen enzyme-the phosphotriesterase. This one is characteristic of some soils' microorganisms, and has been identified as a key player in many biodegradation processes, thanks to its capability for fast hydrolyzing of different OPs. In parallel, we conducted an experiment using native soil in two conditions, sterilized and not sterilized, spiked with specific amounts of two OPs with similar structure-paraoxon-ethyl (PXN) and O-(4-nitrophenyl) O-ethyl methylphosphonate (NEMP). The amount of OP present in the samples and the appearance of characteristic hydrolysis products were periodically monitored for 40 days using analytical techniques. Moreover, the number of microorganisms present was obtained with plate cell count. Our theoretical results were similar to what was achieved in experimental analysis. Parameters calculated by enzymatic hydrolysis were better for PXN than for NEMP. In soil, PXN suffered a faster hydrolysis than NEMP, and the cell count for PXN was higher than for NEMP, highlighting the higher microbiological toxicity of the latter. All these results pointed out that theoretical study can offer a better comprehension of the possible mechanisms involved in real biodegradation processes, showing potential in exploring how biodegradation of OPs relates with enzymatic interactions.Entities:
Keywords: bioremediation; molecular modeling; organophosphorus compounds; phosphotriesterase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31878010 PMCID: PMC6982719 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25010058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of paraoxon-ethyl (PXN) and O-(4-nitrophenyl) O-ethyl methylphosphonate (NEMP).
Figure 2A proposed general pesticide-degrading mechanism for the phosphotriesterase (PTE)-catalyzed hydrolysis of PXN and NEMP. Adapted from Zhang et al. [26].
Figure 3Best redocking pose. EBP: diethyl 4-methylbenzylphosphonate.
Docking results for the organophosphorus (OP).
| OP | Distance O(OP)-Cd (Å) | Distance O(Asp301)-Cd | Intermolecular Energy (kcal/mol) | H-Bond Energy (kcal/mol) | H-Bond Interaction Residues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PXN | 3.57 | 3.21 | −99.33 | −0.26 | Trp131 |
| NEMP | 4.56 | 3.21 | −89.40 | −0.69 | His257 |
Figure 4Best docking poses for PXN and NEMP.
Figure 5Total energy for the systems PTE/PXN and PTE/NEMP during 50 ns of molecular dynamics (MD) simulation.
Figure 6Root mean square deviation (RMSD) plots for PTE/PXN and PTE/NEMP during 50 ns of MD simulation.
Figure 7RMSD fluctuation (F-RMSD) plots for PTE/PXN and PTE/NEMP during 50 ns of MD simulation.
Figure 8H-bond prevalence for the system PTE/PXN and PTE/NEMP.
Figure 9H-bond prevalence for the system PTE/NEMP.
H-bond interactions for the systems PTE/PXN and PTE/NEMP.
| OP | Average H-Bond Number | Interaction Residues |
|---|---|---|
| PXN | 1 | Asn312 |
| NEMP | 1 | Ser75 |
| Lys82 | ||
| Ser267 | ||
| Phe306 | ||
| Ser308 | ||
| Tyr309 | ||
| Thr311 | ||
| Asn312 |
Figure 10Average interatomic distance O(OP)-Cd for PXN and NEMP.
Microbial viability of soil.
| Sample | Soil with Water | Soil with PXN | Soil with NEMP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 days |
|
|
|
| 10 days |
|
|
|
| 20 days |
|
|
|
| 30 days |
|
|
|
| 40 days |
|
|
|
Evaluation of the quantitative methodology results.
| Parameter | Criteria | NEMP | PXN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selectivity | Not find any interference in the analysis of soil blank. | No interference at retention time 17.4 ± 1. | No interference at retention time 18.3 ± 1 |
| Linearity | Linear regression; | y = 157,640.29 x − 413,553.34 | y = 847,053.87 x − 1592,824.70 |
| Precision | Repeatability measured by relative standard deviation; mean value below 20% was considered satisfactory. Levels: 8, 24, 40 µmol/kg. | 15.81 ± 5.57% | 16.28 ± 5.61% |
| Detection limit | Method based on analytical curve parameters; | 0.86 µmol/kg of soil | 0.62 µmol/kg of soil |
| Quantification limit | 2.90 µmol/kg of soil | 2.07 µmol/kg of soil |
Accuracy and recovery test results.
| Accuracy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP | Concentration (µmol/kg) | Mean Value + SD | Criteria | Aceptance | ||
| 8 | 24 | 40 | ||||
| Recovery for NEMP | 42.37% | 46.45% | 53.14% | 47.32 ± 5.44% | Recovery test; mean value for all variation range above or near to 50% was considered satisfactory | Satisfactory |
| Recovery for PXN | 41.30% | 59.59% | 69.95% | 56.95 ± 14.50% | Satisfactory | |
Figure 11Experimental results to degradation in time of NEMP and PXN in sterile soil sample.
Figure 12Experimental results for degradation in time of NEMP and PXN in natural soil sample.
Values with intervals for 95% of confidence obtained in sterile soil (µmol of OP/kg of soil).
| 0 | 1 Day | 10 Days | 20 Days | 30 Days | 40 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEMP | 40 | 32.82 ± 1.8 | 5.86 ± 0.73 | 4.04 ± 0.05 | 0.98 ± 0.03 | 0.86 |
| PXN | 40 | 39.4 ± 1.90 | 30.06 ± 2.31 | 25.91 ± 1.35 | 21.66 ± 0.80 | 18.83 ± 0.65 |
Values with intervals for 95% of confidence obtained in natural soil (µmol of OP/kg of soil).
| 0 | 1 Day | 10 Days | 20 Days | 30 Days | 40 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEMP | 40 | 6.02 ± 0.34 | 1.44 ± 0.07 | 0.89 ± 0.01 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| PXN | 40 | 13.45 ± 1.77 | 6.82 ± 0.90 | 0.85 ± 0.13 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
Degradation experiment equations for NEMP and PXN.
| NEMP | PXN | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equation | Equation | |||
| Natural soil |
| 0.89 |
| 0.94 |
| Sterilized soil |
| 0.93 |
| 0.96 |
Half-life for NEMP and PXN.
| NEMP t1/2-Value | PXN t1/2-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Soil | Sterilized Soil | Natural Soil | Sterilized Soil |
| 5.49 | 6.97 | 5.62 | 36.29 |
Physicochemical characteristics of soil samples.
| pH (In Water) | P | K | Ca | Mg | Al | H + Al | Na |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.9 (moderate) | 69 mg/dm3 | 72 mg/dm3 | 2.8 cmolc/dm3 (high) | 0.8 cmolc/dm3 | 0.0 cmolc/dm3 | 2.2 cmolc/dm3 | 0.1 cmolc/dm3 |
Physicochemical characteristics of soil samples (continuation).
| N | C | Electric Conditivity | Cation Exchange Capacity | Organic Matter | Granulometry | Class/Texture | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 0.21 dS/cm | Effective | 3.9 cmolc/dm3 | 34.3 g/dm3 (high) | Sand | 778 g/kg | Sandy |
| pH 7 | 6.1 cmolc/dm3 | Silt | 156 g/kg | |||||
| Sum of bases | 3.9 cmolc/dm3 | Clay | 66 g/kg | |||||