OBJECTIVE: To examine if reductions in added sugar intake or increases in fiber intake in response to a 16-week intervention were related to improvements in metabolic outcomes related to type 2 diabetes mellitus risk. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized control trial. SETTING: Intervention classes at a lifestyle laboratory and metabolic measures at the General Clinical Research Center. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four overweight Latino adolescents (mean [SD] age, 15.5 [1] years). Intervention Sixteen-week study with 3 groups: control, nutrition, or nutrition plus strength training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; visceral adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging; glucose and insulin incremental area under the curve by oral glucose tolerance test; insulin sensitivity, acute insulin response, and disposition index by intravenous glucose tolerance test; and dietary intake by 3-day records. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of all participants decreased added sugar intake (mean decrease, 47 g/d) and 59% increased fiber intake (mean increase, 5 g/d), and percentages were similar in all intervention groups, including controls. Those who decreased added sugar intake had an improvement in glucose incremental area under the curve (-15% vs +3%; P = .049) and insulin incremental area under the curve (-33% vs -9%; P = .02). Those who increased fiber intake had an improvement in body mass index (-2% vs +2%; P = .01) and visceral adipose tissue (-10% vs no change; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who reduced added sugar intake by the equivalent of 1 can of soda per day or increased fiber intake by the equivalent of a cup of beans showed improvements in key risk factors for type 2 diabetes, specifically in insulin secretion and visceral fat. Improvements occurred independent of group assignment and were equally likely to occur in control group participants.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine if reductions in added sugar intake or increases in fiber intake in response to a 16-week intervention were related to improvements in metabolic outcomes related to type 2 diabetes mellitus risk. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized control trial. SETTING: Intervention classes at a lifestyle laboratory and metabolic measures at the General Clinical Research Center. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four overweight Latino adolescents (mean [SD] age, 15.5 [1] years). Intervention Sixteen-week study with 3 groups: control, nutrition, or nutrition plus strength training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; visceral adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging; glucose and insulin incremental area under the curve by oral glucose tolerance test; insulin sensitivity, acute insulin response, and disposition index by intravenous glucose tolerance test; and dietary intake by 3-day records. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of all participants decreased added sugar intake (mean decrease, 47 g/d) and 59% increased fiber intake (mean increase, 5 g/d), and percentages were similar in all intervention groups, including controls. Those who decreased added sugar intake had an improvement in glucose incremental area under the curve (-15% vs +3%; P = .049) and insulin incremental area under the curve (-33% vs -9%; P = .02). Those who increased fiber intake had an improvement in body mass index (-2% vs +2%; P = .01) and visceral adipose tissue (-10% vs no change; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who reduced added sugar intake by the equivalent of 1 can of soda per day or increased fiber intake by the equivalent of a cup of beans showed improvements in key risk factors for type 2 diabetes, specifically in insulin secretion and visceral fat. Improvements occurred independent of group assignment and were equally likely to occur in control group participants.
Authors: Marc J Weigensberg; Geoff D C Ball; Gabriel Q Shaibi; Martha L Cruz; Michael I Goran Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Cara B Ebbeling; Michael M Leidig; Kelly B Sinclair; Linda G Seger-Shippee; Henry A Feldman; David S Ludwig Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Cara B Ebbeling; Henry A Feldman; Stavroula K Osganian; Virginia R Chomitz; Sheila J Ellenbogen; David S Ludwig Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Lauren T Cook; Gillian A O'Reilly; Michael I Goran; Marc J Weigensberg; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jaimie N Davis Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Susan M Schembre; Cheng Kun Wen; Jaimie N Davis; Ernest Shen; Selena T Nguyen-Rodriguez; Britni R Belcher; Ya-Wen Hsu; Marc J Weigensberg; Michael I Goran; Donna Spruijt-Metz Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: J N Davis; E E Ventura; A Tung; M A Munevar; R E Hasson; C Byrd-Williams; A K Vanni; D Spruijt-Metz; M Weigensberg; M I Goran Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Brooke M Bell; Lauren Martinez; Marientina Gotsis; H Chad Lane; Jaimie N Davis; Luz Antunez-Castillo; Gisele Ragusa; Donna Spruijt-Metz Journal: Games Health J Date: 2018-02-02
Authors: Raman Khanna; Pamela J Stoddard; Elizabeth N Gonzales; Mariana Villagran-Flores; Joan Thomson; Paul Bayard; Ana Gabriela Palos Lucio; Dean Schillinger; Stefano Bertozzi; Ralph Gonzales Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2014-09-19