N M Gatto1, L C Martinez2, D Spruijt-Metz2,3,4, J N Davis5. 1. Center for Nutrition, Healthy Lifestyles & Disease Prevention, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, USA. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA. 3. Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA. 5. Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Los Angeles, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many programmes for children that involve gardening and nutrition components exist; however, none include experimental designs allowing more rigorous evaluation of their impact on obesity. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to explore the effects of a novel 12-week gardening, nutrition and cooking intervention {'LA Sprouts'} on dietary intake, obesity parameters and metabolic disease risk among low-income, primarily Hispanic/Latino youth in Los Angeles.. METHODS: This study used a randomized control trial involving four elementary schools [two randomized to intervention {172, 3rd-5th grade students}; two randomized to control {147, 3rd-5th grade students}]. Classes were taught in 90-min sessions once per week for 12 weeks. Data collected at pre-intervention and post-intervention included dietary intake via food frequency questionnaire, anthropometric measures {body mass index, waist circumference}, body fat, and fasting blood samples. RESULTS:LA Sprouts participants compared with controls had significantly greater reductions in body mass index z-scores {-0.1 vs. -0.04, respectively; p = 0.01} and waist circumference {-1.2 vs. 0.1 cm; p < 0.001}. Fewer LA Sprouts participants had the metabolic syndrome after the intervention than before, while controls with metabolic syndrome increased. LA Sprouts participants compared with controls increased dietary fiber intake {+3.4% vs. -16.5%; p = 0.04}. All participants decreased vegetable intake, but decreases were less in LA Sprouts than controls {-3.7% vs. -26.1%; p = 0.04}. Change in fruit intake did not differ between LA Sprouts and controls. CONCLUSIONS:LA Sprouts was effective in reducing obesity and metabolic risk; however, additional larger and longer-term studies are warranted.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Many programmes for children that involve gardening and nutrition components exist; however, none include experimental designs allowing more rigorous evaluation of their impact on obesity. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to explore the effects of a novel 12-week gardening, nutrition and cooking intervention {'LA Sprouts'} on dietary intake, obesity parameters and metabolic disease risk among low-income, primarily Hispanic/Latino youth in Los Angeles.. METHODS: This study used a randomized control trial involving four elementary schools [two randomized to intervention {172, 3rd-5th grade students}; two randomized to control {147, 3rd-5th grade students}]. Classes were taught in 90-min sessions once per week for 12 weeks. Data collected at pre-intervention and post-intervention included dietary intake via food frequency questionnaire, anthropometric measures {body mass index, waist circumference}, body fat, and fasting blood samples. RESULTS: LA Sprouts participants compared with controls had significantly greater reductions in body mass index z-scores {-0.1 vs. -0.04, respectively; p = 0.01} and waist circumference {-1.2 vs. 0.1 cm; p < 0.001}. Fewer LA Sprouts participants had the metabolic syndrome after the intervention than before, while controls with metabolic syndrome increased. LA Sprouts participants compared with controls increased dietary fiber intake {+3.4% vs. -16.5%; p = 0.04}. All participants decreased vegetable intake, but decreases were less in LA Sprouts than controls {-3.7% vs. -26.1%; p = 0.04}. Change in fruit intake did not differ between LA Sprouts and controls. CONCLUSIONS: LA Sprouts was effective in reducing obesity and metabolic risk; however, additional larger and longer-term studies are warranted.
Authors: Janice R Hermann; Stephany P Parker; Barbara J Brown; Youmasu J Siewe; Barbara A Denney; Sarah J Walker Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Charlotte E L Evans; Meaghan S Christian; Christine L Cleghorn; Darren C Greenwood; Janet E Cade Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Meaghan S Christian; Charlotte El Evans; Camilla Nykjaer; Neil Hancock; Janet E Cade Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-08-16 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Brooke M Bell; Lauren Martinez; Marientina Gotsis; H Chad Lane; Jaimie N Davis; Luz Antunez-Castillo; Gisele Ragusa; Donna Spruijt-Metz Journal: Games Health J Date: 2018-02-02
Authors: M J Landry; E Khazaee; A K Markowitz; S Vandyousefi; R Ghaddar; K Pilles; F M Asigbee; N M Gatto; J N Davis Journal: J Hunger Environ Nutr Date: 2018-08-20
Authors: Matthew J Landry; Annie K Markowitz; Fiona M Asigbee; Nicole M Gatto; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jaimie N Davis Journal: Child Obes Date: 2019-03-22 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: India J Ornelas; Kassia Rudd; Sonia Bishop; Desiree Deschenie; Emily Brown; Kevin Lombard; Shirley A A Beresford Journal: Health Behav Policy Rev Date: 2021-05-01