Literature DB >> 19346680

Microbeam studies of the bystander response.

Kevin M Prise1, Giuseppe Schettino, Boris Vojnovic, Oleg Belyakov, Chunlin Shao.   

Abstract

Microbeams have undergone a renaissance since their introduction and early use in the mid 60s. Recent advances in imaging, software and beam delivery have allowed rapid technological developments in microbeams for use in a range of experimental studies. The resurgence in the use of microbeams since the mid 90s has coincided with major changes in our understanding of how radiation interacts with cells. In particular, the evidence that bystander responses occur, where cells not directly irradiated can respond to irradiated neighbours, has brought about the evolution of new models of radiation response. Although these processes have been studied using a range of experimental approaches, microbeams offer a unique route by which bystander responses can be elucidated. Without exception, all of the microbeams currently active internationally have studied bystander responses in a range of cell and tissue models. Together these studies have considerably advanced our knowledge of bystander responses and the underpinning mechanisms. Much of this has come from charged particle microbeam studies, but increasingly, X-ray and electron microbeams are starting to contribute quantitative and mechanistic information on bystander effects. A recent development has been the move from studies with 2-D cell culture models to more complex 3-D systems where the possibilities of utilizing the unique characteristics of microbeams in terms of their spatial and temporal delivery will make a major impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19346680      PMCID: PMC2855959          DOI: 10.1269/jrr.09012s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  43 in total

1.  Induction of a bystander mutagenic effect of alpha particles in mammalian cells.

Authors:  H Zhou; G Randers-Pehrson; C A Waldren; D Vannais; E J Hall; T K Hei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis: I. Transformation in C3H 10T1/2 cells in vitro can be initiated in the unirradiated neighbors of irradiated cells.

Authors:  S G Sawant; G Randers-Pehrson; C R Geard; D J Brenner ; E J Hall
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Medium-mediated bystander effects on HSG cells co-cultivated with cells irradiated by X-rays or a 290 MeV/u carbon beam.

Authors:  C Shao; M Aoki; Y Furusawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Low-dose studies of bystander cell killing with targeted soft X rays.

Authors:  G Schettino; M Folkard; K M Prise; B Vojnovic; K D Held; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Bystander-induced apoptosis and premature differentiation in primary urothelial explants after charged particle microbeam irradiation.

Authors:  O V Belyakov; M Folkard; C Mothersill; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Involvement of the nonhomologous end joining DNA repair pathway in the bystander effect for chromosomal aberrations.

Authors:  John B Little; Hatsumi Nagasawa; Gloria C Li; David J Chen
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Bystander effect induced by counted high-LET particles in confluent human fibroblasts: a mechanistic study.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Yoshiya Furusawa; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Tomoo Funayama; Seiichi Wada
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Direct evidence for a bystander effect of ionizing radiation in primary human fibroblasts.

Authors:  O V Belyakov; A M Malcolmson; M Folkard; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Mitochondria-dependent signalling pathway are involved in the early process of radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  S Chen; Y Zhao; W Han; G Zhao; L Zhu; J Wang; L Bao; E Jiang; A Xu; T K Hei; Z Yu; L Wu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Microirradiation techniques in radiobiological research.

Authors:  Guido A Drexler; Miguel J Ruiz-Gómez
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Confocal microscopy for modeling electron microbeam irradiation of skin.

Authors:  John H Miller; William B Chrisler; Xihai Wang; Marianne B Sowa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Genomic instability after targeted irradiation of human lymphocytes: evidence for inter-individual differences under bystander conditions.

Authors:  Munira A Kadhim; Ryonfa Lee; Stephen R Moore; Denise A Macdonald; Kim L Chapman; Gaurang Patel; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 4.  Radiation-Induced Bystander Response: Mechanism and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Keiji Suzuki; Shunichi Yamashita
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Microbeams in radiation biology: review and critical comparison.

Authors:  K M Prise; G Schettino
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 6.  Radiation induced non-targeted response: mechanism and potential clinical implications.

Authors:  Tom K Hei; Hongning Zhou; Yunfei Chai; Brian Ponnaiya; Vladimir N Ivanov
Journal:  Curr Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.339

Review 7.  Oxidative DNA damage caused by inflammation may link to stress-induced non-targeted effects.

Authors:  Carl N Sprung; Alesia Ivashkevich; Helen B Forrester; Christophe E Redon; Alexandros Georgakilas; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 8.  Redox-modulated phenomena and radiation therapy: the central role of superoxide dismutases.

Authors:  Aaron K Holley; Lu Miao; Daret K St Clair; William H St Clair
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 8.401

9.  hSSB1 rapidly binds at the sites of DNA double-strand breaks and is required for the efficient recruitment of the MRN complex.

Authors:  Derek J Richard; Kienan Savage; Emma Bolderson; Liza Cubeddu; Sairei So; Mihaela Ghita; David J Chen; Malcolm F White; Kerry Richard; Kevin M Prise; Giuseppe Schettino; Kum Kum Khanna
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A simulation study of the radiation-induced bystander effect: modeling with stochastically defined signal reemission.

Authors:  Kohei Sasaki; Kosuke Wakui; Kaori Tsutsumi; Akio Itoh; Hiroyuki Date
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.