Literature DB >> 21113061

Microbeams in radiation biology: review and critical comparison.

K M Prise1, G Schettino.   

Abstract

Microbeams have undergone a renaissance since their introduction and early use in the mid-60s. Recent advances in imaging, software and beam delivery have allowed rapid technological developments in microbeams for use in a range of experimental studies. Microbeams allow the effects of single radiation tracks to be determined in a highly quantified way. They offer a unique tool for following DNA damage and repair in a highly controlled way. More importantly, they allow radiation to be targeted to specific regions within a cell to probe subcellular radiosensitivity. They are also playing an important role in our understanding of bystander responses, where cells not directly irradiated can respond to irradiated neighbours. Although these processes have been studied using a range of experimental approaches, microbeams offer a unique route by which bystander responses can be elucidated. Without exception, all of the microbeams currently active have studied bystander responses in a range of cell and tissue models. Together, these studies have considerably advanced our knowledge of the underpinning mechanisms. Much of this has come from charged particle microbeam studies, but increasingly, X-ray and electron microbeams are starting to contribute quantitative and mechanistic information on bystander effects. A recent development has been the move from studies with 2-D cell culture models to more complex 3-D systems where the possibilities of utilising the unique characteristics of microbeams in terms of their spatial and temporal delivery will make a major impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21113061      PMCID: PMC3050582          DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  33 in total

1.  Long-term genomic instability in human lymphocytes induced by single-particle irradiation.

Authors:  M A Kadhim; S J Marsden; D T Goodhead; A M Malcolmson; M Folkard; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Computational approach for determining the spectrum of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation.

Authors:  H Nikjoo; P O'Neill; W E Wilson; D T Goodhead
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Single ion actions: the induction of micronuclei in V79 cells exposed to individual protons.

Authors:  K M Prise; M Folkard; A M Malcolmson; C H Pullar; G Schettino; A G Bowey; B D Michael
Journal:  Adv Space Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.152

4.  Bystander-induced apoptosis and premature differentiation in primary urothelial explants after charged particle microbeam irradiation.

Authors:  O V Belyakov; M Folkard; C Mothersill; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  M-FISH analysis shows that complex chromosome aberrations induced by alpha -particle tracks are cumulative products of localized rearrangements.

Authors:  Rhona M Anderson; David L Stevens; Dudley T Goodhead
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Jeroen Essers; Adriaan B Houtsmuller; Lieneke van Veelen; Coen Paulusma; Alex L Nigg; Albert Pastink; Wim Vermeulen; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Biological imaging of heavy charged-particle tracks.

Authors:  B Jakob; M Scholz; G Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Low-dose hypersensitivity in Chinese hamster V79 cells targeted with counted protons using a charged-particle microbeam.

Authors:  G Schettino; M Folkard; K M Prise; B Vojnovic; A G Bowey; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 9.  A review of studies of ionizing radiation-induced double-strand break clustering.

Authors:  K M Prise; M Pinto; H C Newman; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  Microbeam studies of the bystander response.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Giuseppe Schettino; Boris Vojnovic; Oleg Belyakov; Chunlin Shao
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.724

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-Induced Bystander Response: Mechanism and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Keiji Suzuki; Shunichi Yamashita
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Oxidative DNA damage caused by inflammation may link to stress-induced non-targeted effects.

Authors:  Carl N Sprung; Alesia Ivashkevich; Helen B Forrester; Christophe E Redon; Alexandros Georgakilas; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  A first generation compact microbeam radiation therapy system based on carbon nanotube X-ray technology.

Authors:  M Hadsell; J Zhang; P Laganis; F Sprenger; J Shan; L Zhang; L Burk; H Yuan; S Chang; J Lu; O Zhou
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Mechanisms and biological importance of photon-induced bystander responses: do they have an impact on low-dose radiation responses.

Authors:  Masanori Tomita; Munetoshi Maeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Ultra-soft X-ray system for imaging the early cellular responses to X-ray induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Jakub A Kochan; Matthias van den Belt; Julia von der Lippe; Emilie C B Desclos; Barbara Steurer; Ron A Hoebe; Enzo M Scutigliani; Jan Verhoeven; Jan Stap; Ruben Bosch; Meindert Rijpkema; Carel van Oven; Henk A van Veen; Irene Stellingwerf; Lianne E M Vriend; Jurgen A Marteijn; Jacob A Aten; Przemek M Krawczyk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Monte-Carlo dosimetry and real-time imaging of targeted irradiation consequences in 2-cell stage Caenorhabditis elegans embryo.

Authors:  Eva Torfeh; Marina Simon; Giovanna Muggiolu; Guillaume Devès; François Vianna; Stéphane Bourret; Sébastien Incerti; Philippe Barberet; Hervé Seznec
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  SPICE-NIRS microbeam: a focused vertical system for proton irradiation of a single cell for radiobiological research.

Authors:  Teruaki Konishi; Masakazu Oikawa; Noriyoshi Suya; Takahiro Ishikawa; Takeshi Maeda; Alisa Kobayashi; Naoko Shiomi; Kumiko Kodama; Tsuyoshi Hamano; Shino Homma-Takeda; Mayu Isono; Kotaro Hieda; Yukio Uchihori; Yoshiyuki Shirakawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Applications of High-Throughput Clonogenic Survival Assays in High-LET Particle Microbeams.

Authors:  Antonios Georgantzoglou; Michael J Merchant; Jonathan C G Jeynes; Natalie Mayhead; Natasha Punia; Rachel E Butler; Rajesh Jena
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.