Literature DB >> 11182789

The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis: I. Transformation in C3H 10T1/2 cells in vitro can be initiated in the unirradiated neighbors of irradiated cells.

S G Sawant1, G Randers-Pehrson, C R Geard, D J Brenner , E J Hall.   

Abstract

It has long been accepted that radiation-induced genetic effects require that DNA be hit and damaged directly by the radiation. Recently, evidence has accumulated that in cell populations exposed to low doses of alpha particles, biological effects occur in a larger proportion of cells than are estimated to have been traversed by alpha particles. The end points observed include chromosome aberrations, mutations and gene expression. The development of a fast single-cell microbeam now makes it possible to expose a precisely known proportion of cells in a population to exactly defined numbers of alpha particles, and to assay for oncogenic transformation. The single-cell microbeam delivered no, one, two, four or eight alpha particles through the nuclei of all or just 10% of C3H 10T1/2 cells. We show that (a) more cells can be inactivated than were actually traversed by alpha particles and (b) when 10% of the cells on a dish are exposed to alpha particles, the resulting frequency of induced transformation is not less than that observed when every cell on the dish is exposed to the same number of alpha particles. These observations constitute evidence suggesting a bystander effect, i.e., that unirradiated cells are responding to damage induced in irradiated cells. This bystander effect in a biological system of relevance to carcinogenesis could have significant implications for risk estimation for low-dose radiation.

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11182789     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0397:tbeiro]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  67 in total

1.  Radiation risk to low fluences of alpha particles may be greater than we thought.

Authors:  H Zhou; M Suzuki; G Randers-Pehrson; D Vannais; G Chen; J E Trosko; C A Waldren; T K Hei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Low-dose radiation: thresholds, bystander effects, and adaptive responses.

Authors:  William M Bonner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Interaction between radiation-induced adaptive response and bystander mutagenesis in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Hongning Zhou; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Charles R Geard; David J Brenner; Eric J Hall; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces bystander responses.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Melvyn Folkard; Barry D Michael; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Radiation Induced Bystander Effect in vivo.

Authors:  Yunfei Chai; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Acta Med Nagasaki       Date:  2008

6.  Chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes of patients treated with radium-224 for ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  G Stephan; W U Kampen; D Nosske; H Roos
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Biological effects in unirradiated human tissue induced by radiation damage up to 1 mm away.

Authors:  Oleg V Belyakov; Stephen A Mitchell; Deep Parikh; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Stephen A Marino; Sally A Amundson; Charles R Geard; David J Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Demonstration of a radiation-induced bystander effect for low dose low LET beta-particles.

Authors:  Rudranath Persaud; Hongning Zhou; Tom K Hei; Eric J Hall
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 9.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.