Literature DB >> 19342422

Mass media campaign improves cervical screening across all socio-economic groups.

Jenny O Anderson1, Robyn M Mullins, Mohammad Siahpush, Matthew J Spittal, Melanie Wakefield.   

Abstract

Low socio-economic status (SES) has been associated with lower cervical screening rates. Mass media is one known strategy that can increase cervical screening participation. This study sought to determine whether a mass media campaign conducted in Victoria, Australia, in 2005 was effective in encouraging women across all SES groups to screen. Data were obtained from the Victorian Cervical Cytology Registry for each Pap test registered during 2005 and categorized into SES quintiles using the Index of Socio-Economic Advantage/Disadvantage. Negative binomial regression was used to determine the impact of the campaign on the weekly number of Pap tests and whether the media campaign had a differential effect by SES, after adjusting for the number of workdays per week, age group and time since previous test. Cervical screening increased 27% during the campaign period and was equally effective in encouraging screening across all SES groups, including low-SES women. Mass media campaigns can prompt increased rates of cervical screening among all women, not just those from more advantaged areas. Combining media with additional strategies targeted at low-SES women may help lessen the underlying differences in screening rates across SES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19342422     DOI: 10.1093/her/cyp023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  11 in total

1.  Facts or stories? How to use social media for cervical cancer prevention: A multi-method study of the effects of sender type and content type on increased message sharing.

Authors:  Jingwen Zhang; Gem Le; David Larochelle; Rena Pasick; George F Sawaya; Urmimala Sarkar; Damon Centola
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Associations between the Department of Veterans Affairs' suicide prevention campaign and calls to related crisis lines.

Authors:  Robert M Bossarte; Elizabeth Karras; Naiji Lu; Xin Tu; Brady Stephens; John Draper; Janet E Kemp
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  A framework for evaluating the impact of obesity prevention strategies on socioeconomic inequalities in weight.

Authors:  Kathryn Backholer; Alison Beauchamp; Kylie Ball; Gavin Turrell; Jane Martin; Julie Woods; Anna Peeters
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour.

Authors:  Melanie A Wakefield; Barbara Loken; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; Lorie L Davis; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Increased incidence of kidney diseases in general practice after a nationwide albuminuria self-test program.

Authors:  Julia de Borst; Markus M J Nielen; Robert A Verheij; François G Schellevis
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Finding the keys to successful adult-targeted advertisements on obesity prevention: an experimental audience testing study.

Authors:  Helen Dixon; Maree Scully; Sarah Durkin; Emily Brennan; Trish Cotter; Sarah Maloney; Blythe J O'Hara; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Information needs of young women vaccinated against HPV attending colposcopy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ailie Young; Seonaidh Cotton; Margaret Eleanor Cruickshank
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Coverage of common cancer types in UK national newspapers: a content analysis.

Authors:  Julie Konfortion; Ruth H Jack; Elizabeth A Davies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Melanoma Disparities among US Hispanics: Use of the Social Ecological Model to Contextualize Reasons for Inequitable Outcomes and Frame a Research Agenda.

Authors:  Valerie M Harvey; Charlene W Oldfield; Jarvis T Chen; Karl Eschbach
Journal:  J Skin Cancer       Date:  2016-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.