Literature DB >> 31226342

Facts or stories? How to use social media for cervical cancer prevention: A multi-method study of the effects of sender type and content type on increased message sharing.

Jingwen Zhang1, Gem Le2, David Larochelle3, Rena Pasick4, George F Sawaya5, Urmimala Sarkar2, Damon Centola6.   

Abstract

Social media has become a valuable tool for disseminating cancer prevention information. However, the design of messages for achieving wide dissemination remains poorly understood. We conducted a multi-method study to identify the effects of sender type (individuals or organizations) and content type (personal experiences or factual information) on promoting the spread of cervical cancer prevention messages over social media. First, we used observational Twitter data to examine correlations between sender type and content type with retweet activity. Then, to confirm the causal impact of message properties, we constructed 900 experimental tweets according to a 2 (sender type) by 2 (content type) factorial design and tested their probabilities of being shared in an online platform. A total of 782 female participants were randomly assigned to 87 independent 9-person online groups and each received a unique message feed of 100 tweets drawn from the 4 experimental cells over 5 days. We conducted both tweet-level and group-level analyses to examine the causal effects of tweet properties on influencing sharing behaviors. Personal experience tweets and organizational senders were associated with more retweets. However, the experimental study revealed that informational tweets were shared significantly more (19%, 95% CI: 11 to 27) than personal experience tweets; and organizational senders were shared significantly more (10%, 95% CI: 3 to 18) than individual senders. While rare personal experience messages can achieve large success, they are generally unsuccessful; however, there is a reproducible causal effect of messages that use organizational senders and factual information for achieving greater peer-to-peer dissemination.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer prevention; Dissemination; Multi-method study; Social media; Tweets

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31226342      PMCID: PMC6697580          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  37 in total

1.  A national initiative for women and healthcare providers: CDC's Inside Knowledge: Get the Facts About Gynecologic Cancer campaign.

Authors:  Sun Hee Rim; Lindsey Polonec; Sherri L Stewart; Cynthia A Gelb
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Mass media campaign improves cervical screening across all socio-economic groups.

Authors:  Jenny O Anderson; Robyn M Mullins; Mohammad Siahpush; Matthew J Spittal; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-04-02

3.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Effectiveness of catch-up human papillomavirus vaccination on incident cervical neoplasia in a US health-care setting: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Michael J Silverberg; Wendy A Leyden; Jennifer O Lam; Steven E Gregorich; Megan J Huchko; Shalini Kulasingam; Miriam Kuppermann; Karen K Smith-McCune; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-08-08

5.  Effect of health care system distrust on breast and cervical cancer screening in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Tse-Chuan Yang; Stephen A Matthews; Marianne M Hillemeier
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Social Media as a Tool to Promote Health Awareness: Results from an Online Cervical Cancer Prevention Study.

Authors:  Helena C Lyson; Gem M Le; Jingwen Zhang; Natalie Rivadeneira; Courtney Lyles; Kate Radcliffe; Rena J Pasick; George Sawaya; Urmimala Sarkar; Damon Centola
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Predictors of cervical Pap smear screening awareness, intention, and receipt among Vietnamese-American women.

Authors:  Tung T Nguyen; Stephen J McPhee; Thoa Nguyen; Tram Lam; Jeremiah Mock
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liliana Laranjo; Amaël Arguel; Ana L Neves; Aideen M Gallagher; Ruth Kaplan; Nathan Mortimer; Guilherme A Mendes; Annie Y S Lau
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Arica White; Trevor D Thompson; Mary C White; Susan A Sabatino; Janet de Moor; Paul V Doria-Rose; Ann M Geiger; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Virality prediction and community structure in social networks.

Authors:  Lilian Weng; Filippo Menczer; Yong-Yeol Ahn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  7 in total

1.  Application of vincristine and cisplatin combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Heling Zhang; Ye Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Qualitative assessment of attitudes toward cervical cancer (CC) screening and HPV self-sampling among African American (AA) and Sub Saharan African Immigrant (SAI) women.

Authors:  Adebola Adegboyega; Adeyimika T Desmennu; Mark Dignan
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 2.732

3.  Quality over quantity: human papillomavirus vaccine information on social media and associations with adult and child vaccination.

Authors:  Annalynn M Galvin; Ashvita Garg; Jonathan D Moore; Dana M Litt; Erika L Thompson
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.526

4.  What triggers online help-seeking retransmission during the COVID-19 period? Empirical evidence from Chinese social media.

Authors:  Chen Luo; Yuru Li; Anfan Chen; Yulong Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Celebrities and Breast Cancer: A Multidimensional Quali-Quantitative Analysis of News Stories Shared on Social Media.

Authors:  Priscila Biancovilli; Lilla Makszin; Faten Amer; Alexandra Csongor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 6.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Communication for Public Health: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elisabetta Ceretti; Loredana Covolo; Francesca Cappellini; Alberto Nanni; Sara Sorosina; Andrea Beatini; Mirella Taranto; Arianna Gasparini; Paola De Castro; Silvio Brusaferro; Umberto Gelatti
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 7.076

7.  Knowledge and perspectives of the new National Cervical Screening Program: a qualitative interview study of North Queensland women-'I could be that one percent'.

Authors:  Archana Nagendiram; Rachel Bidgood; Jennifer Banks; Clare Heal
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.