Literature DB >> 17511115

The learning curve in pancreatic surgery.

Jennifer F Tseng1, Peter W T Pisters, Jeffrey E Lee, Huamin Wang, Henry F Gomez, Charlotte C Sun, Douglas B Evans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic surgery is technically complex. We hypothesized that a learning curve existed for pancreaticoduodenectomy even for surgeons who had completed their training.
METHODS: During 1990 to 2004, we studied 650 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy by 3 surgeons who began their attending careers at 1 center. Operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), and the status of resection margins (for pancreatic adenocarcinoma) were analyzed. The chi2, independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to evaluate differences in categorical, normally distributed continuous, and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively. Using serial groups of 30 cases, median operative time, EBL, and LOS were calculated and the trend over time modeled using third-order polynomial equations. Trends in retroperitoneal margin positivity (R0/R1) were assessed.
RESULTS: From the first 60 cases per surgeon to the second 60 cases per surgeon, the median EBL dropped (1100 vs 725 mL, P < .001), operative time decreased (589 vs 513 minutes, P < .001), and LOS decreased (15 vs 13 days, P = .004). The proportion of microscopically positive or suspicious margins also decreased from the surgeons' first 60 cases each to the second 60 cases (30% vs 8%, P < .001). Extended analysis of a single surgeon's cases suggested that additional experience provided further incremental improvement (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy has an inherent learning curve. After 60 cases, surgeons achieved significantly decreased EBL, operative time, and LOS, and carried out more margin-negative resections. Improvement in measured outcomes continues during the operative career.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17511115     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  46 in total

1.  Defining the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy around the world.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Giuseppe Malleo; Claudio Bassi; Michael H Sprys; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Achieving good perioperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low-volume setting: a 25-year experience.

Authors:  Aljamir D Chedid; Marcio F Chedid; Leonardo V Winkelmann; Tomaz J M Grezzana Filho; Cleber D P Kruel
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

3.  The First Decade of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States: Costs and Outcomes Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Thuy B Tran; Monica M Dua; David J Worhunsky; George A Poultsides; Jeffrey A Norton; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Comparing healthcare systems: outcomes, ethical principles, and social values.

Authors:  Eike-Henner W Kluge
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-11-07

5.  Incorporating an HPB fellowship does not diminish surgical residents' HPB experience in a high-volume training centre.

Authors:  Nicholas J Zyromski; Laura Torbeck; David F Canal; Keith D Lillemoe; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Assessing the experience in complex hepatopancreatobiliary surgery among graduating chief residents: is the operative experience enough?

Authors:  Teviah E Sachs; Aslam Ejaz; Matthew Weiss; Gaya Spolverato; Nita Ahuja; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  The impact of resident involvement on surgical outcomes among patients undergoing hepatic and pancreatic resections.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; Matthew Weiss; Martin A Makary; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Management of pancreatic cancer: current status and future directions.

Authors:  H Ramesh
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Can we apply the process improvement tool Six Sigma to enhance outcomes in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery?

Authors:  Parul J Shukla; Savio G Barreto
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Gregory T Kennedy; Matthew T McMillan; Michael H Sprys; Claudio Bassi; Paul D Greig; Paul D Hansen; Dhiresh R Jeyarajah; Tara S Kent; Giuseppe Malleo; Giovanni Marchegiani; Rebecca M Minter; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.