Literature DB >> 10647644

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience.

B Guillonneau1, G Vallancien.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluate our experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 1, 1998 and May 1, 1999, 120 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Morbidity of the first 40 (group 1), next 40 (group 2) and last 40 (group 3) procedures was compared. Oncological data were assessed by pathological examination and postoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA). Functional results were assessed by a self-administered questionnaire for the first 60 patients and potency was assessed in the last 40.
RESULTS: Mean operating time plus or minus standard deviation was 239+/-59 minutes (range 150 to 450) for the series, and 282, 247 and 231, respectively, for groups 1, 2 and 3. Surgical conversion was necessary in 7 cases (5.8%) overall, including 10% (4) in group 1, 7.5% (3) in group 2 and 0% in group 3. Mean intraoperative bleeding was 402+/-293 ml. (range 50 to 1,500) in the series, and 534, 517 and 277, respectively, for groups 1, 2 and 3. The transfusion rate was 10% overall, and 15%, 12.5% and 2.5%, respectively, in groups 1, 2 and 3. The reoperation rate was 1.7%. Mean postoperative bladder catheterization time was 6.6+/-2.4 days. The positive and questionable surgical margin rate was 15%. Pathological tumor stage was pT2a in 4 specimens (11%), pT2b in 11 (16%), pT3a in 0 and pT3b in 3 (50%) with positive surgical margins. PSA assays were available in 94 patients with a mean postoperative followup of 2.2 months (range 1 to 12). Serum PSA was 0.1 ng./ml. or less in 89 men (94.7%). The continence rate at 6 months postoperatively was 72% among the first 60 patients. Of 20 group 3 patients who were sexually active preoperatively 9 (45%) reported postoperative spontaneous erections. The overall cost of retropubic radical prostatectomy was about $1,237 more than that for laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is feasible and perioperative morbidity is low. Based on our postoperative followup, oncological results are identical to those of conventional surgery and functional results are encouraging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10647644     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67890-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  60 in total

Review 1.  [Indications for and results of radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Graefen; P G Hammerer; A Haese; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Results after 300 procedures].

Authors:  J-U Stolzenburg; M C Truss; R Rabenalt; M Do; H Pfeiffer; A Bekos; J Neuhaus; C G Stief; U Jonas; W Dorschner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients.

Authors:  L Goeman; L Salomon; A La De Taille; D Vordos; A Hoznek; R Yiou; C C Abbou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

7.  Laparoscopic prostatectomy: where do we stand?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

8.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a brief review of outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew D Shuford
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2007-10

9.  Early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of preoperative erectile function and nerve-sparing procedure as predictors.

Authors:  Atsushi Takenaka; Hideo Soga; Toshifumi Kurahashi; Hideaki Miyake; Kazushi Tanaka; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Robert B Nadler; Jessica T Casey; Lee C Zhao; Neema Navai; Zachary L Smith; Ali Zhumkhawala; Amanda M Macejko
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.