Literature DB >> 18207316

Effects of pathologic stage on the learning curve for radical prostatectomy: evidence that recurrence in organ-confined cancer is largely related to inadequate surgical technique.

Andrew J Vickers1, Fernando J Bianco, Mithat Gonen, Angel M Cronin, James A Eastham, Deborah Schrag, Eric A Klein, Alwyn M Reuther, Michael W Kattan, J Edson Pontes, Peter T Scardino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We previously demonstrated that there is a learning curve for open radical prostatectomy. We sought to determine whether the effects of the learning curve are modified by pathologic stage.
METHODS: The study included 7765 eligible prostate cancer patients treated with open radical prostatectomy by one of 72 surgeons. Surgeon experience was coded as the total number of radical prostatectomies conducted by the surgeon prior to a patient's surgery. Multivariable regression models of survival time were used to evaluate the association between surgeon experience and biochemical recurrence, with adjustment for PSA, stage, and grade. Analyses were conducted separately for patients with organ-confined and locally advanced disease.
RESULTS: Five-year recurrence-free probability for patients with organ-confined disease approached 100% for the most experienced surgeons. Conversely, the learning curve for patients with locally advanced disease reached a plateau at approximately 70%, suggesting that about a third of these patients cannot be cured by surgery alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Excellent rates of cancer control for patients with organ-confined disease treated by the most experienced surgeons suggest that the primary reason such patients recur is inadequate surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18207316      PMCID: PMC2637145          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  11 in total

Review 1.  Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Clara Lee; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Quality assurance issues in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  H Van Poppel; S F F Boulanger; S Joniau
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Transcending the volume-outcome relationship in cancer care.

Authors:  Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Deborah Schrag; Katherine S Panageas; Elyn Riedel; Laura D Cramer; Jose G Guillem; Peter B Bach; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Quality control of radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  H Van Poppel; L Collette; Z Kirkali; M Brausi; W Hoekstra; D W Newling; M Decoster
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a proposal for a standardized definition.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Zohar A Dotan; Fernando J Bianco; Hans Lilja; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Elyn R Riedel; Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Deborah Schrag; Joan L Warren; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Fernando J Bianco; Angel M Serio; James A Eastham; Deborah Schrag; Eric A Klein; Alwyn M Reuther; Michael W Kattan; J Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Karen F Gold; Chris L Pashos; Shilpa S Mehta; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  29 in total

1.  Surgery confounds biology: the predictive value of stage-, grade- and prostate-specific antigen for recurrence after radical prostatectomy as a function of surgeon experience.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Caroline J Savage; Fernando J Bianco; Eric A Klein; Michael W Kattan; Fernando P Secin; Bertrand D Guilloneau; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  [Diagnostics and therapy of localized prostate cancer: a problem-oriented account].

Authors:  C Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sarah J Drouin; Christophe Vaessen; Vincent Hupertan; Eva Comperat; Vincent Misraï; Alain Haertig; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; François Richard; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Anders Bjartell; Stephen J Freedland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jim C Hu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Andrew Evans; John Srigley; Joseph L Chin; Bish Bora; Amber Hunter; Robin McLeod; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Fellowship training as a modifier of the surgical learning curve.

Authors:  Fernando J Bianco; Angel M Cronin; Eric A Klein; J Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Fernando J Bianco; Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Eric A Klein; James A Eastham; J Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Low annual caseloads of United States surgeons conducting radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Caroline J Savage; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prostate cancer: estimating the benefits of PSA screening.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Radical prostatectomy: surgical planning, execution, and outcomes.

Authors:  Fernando J Bianco
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.