Literature DB >> 33850180

Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return.

Xiaoyu Tang1, Xueli Wang2, Xing Peng3, Qi Li4, Chi Zhang5, Aijun Wang6, Ming Zhang7.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slower response to targets appearing on the same side as the cue (valid locations) than to targets appearing on the opposite side as the cue (invalid locations). Previous behaviour studies have found that the visual IOR is larger than the audiovisual IOR when focusing on both visual and auditory modalities. Utilising the high temporal resolution of the event-related potential (ERP) technique we explored the possible neural correlates with the behaviour IOR difference between visual and audiovisual targets. The behavioural results revealed that the visual IOR was larger than the audiovisual IOR. The ERP results showed that the visual IOR effect was generated from the P1 and N2 components, while the audiovisual IOR effect was derived only from the P3 component. Multisensory integration (MSI) of audiovisual targets occurred on the P1, N1 and P3 components, which may offset the reduced perceptual processing due to audiovisual IOR. The results of early and late differences in the neural processing of the visual IOR and audiovisual IOR imply that the two target types may have different inhibitory orientation mechanisms.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33850180     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86999-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  52 in total

1.  An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return.

Authors:  J J McDonald; L M Ward; K A Kiehl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-10

2.  Inhibition of return.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Spatial attention and crossmodal interactions between vision and touch.

Authors:  E Macaluso; J Driver
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Early multisensory interactions affect the competition among multiple visual objects.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Durk Talsma; Christian N L Olivers; Clayton Hickey; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Inhibition of saccadic eye movements to locations in spatial working memory.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

7.  Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return.

Authors:  C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-01

8.  Electrophysiological evidence of an attentional bias in crossmodal inhibition of return.

Authors:  Allison M Pierce; John J McDonald; Jessica J Green
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Yulin Gao; Weiping Yang; Yanna Ren; Jinglong Wu; Ming Zhang; Qiong Wu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Capture of visual attention interferes with multisensory speech processing.

Authors:  Hanna Krause; Till R Schneider; Andreas K Engel; Daniel Senkowski
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Multisensory integration attenuates visually induced oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Mengying Yuan; Zhongyu Shi; Min Gao; Rongxia Ren; Ming Wei; Yulin Gao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.004

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.