Literature DB >> 19336808

Total ankle replacement in patients with significant pre-operative deformity of the hindfoot.

S A Hobson1, A Karantana, S Dhar.   

Abstract

We carried out 123 consecutive total ankle replacements in 111 patients with a mean follow-up of four years (2 to 8). Patients with a hindfoot deformity of up to 10 degrees (group A, 91 ankles) were compared with those with a deformity of 11 degrees to 30 degrees (group B, 32 ankles). There were 18 failures (14.6%), with no significant difference in survival between groups A and B. The clinical outcome as measured by the post-operative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons score was significantly better in group B (p = 0.036). There was no difference between the groups regarding the post-operative range of movement and complications. Correction of the hindfoot deformity was achieved to within 5 degrees of neutral in 27 ankles (84%) of group B patients. However, gross instability was the most common mode of failure in group B. This was not adequately corrected by reconstruction of the lateral ligament. Total ankle replacement can safely be performed in patients with a hindfoot deformity of up to 30 degrees . The importance of adequate correction of alignment and instability is highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19336808     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B4.20855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  20 in total

1.  [Total ankle replacement for varus deformity].

Authors:  M Knupp; L Bolliger; A Barg; B Hintermann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Total ankle replacement: why, when and how?

Authors:  Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Federico Dettoni; John E Femino; Phinit Phisitkul; Margherita Germano; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Matthias D Wimmer; Martin Wiewiorski; Dieter C Wirtz; Geert I Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Position of the prosthesis components in total ankle replacement and the effect on motion at the replaced joint.

Authors:  Francesco Cenni; Alberto Leardini; Andrea Cheli; Fabio Catani; Claudio Belvedere; Matteo Romagnoli; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  A systematic review of outcome and failure rate of uncemented Scandinavian total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Hongmou Zhao; Yunfeng Yang; Guangrong Yu; Jiaqian Zhou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Survival of the Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR): results of ten to nineteen years follow-up.

Authors:  Arno Frigg; Ursula Germann; Martin Huber; Monika Horisberger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Total ankle replacement: is pre-operative varus deformity a predictor of poor survival rate and clinical and radiological outcomes?

Authors:  Federico Giuseppe Usuelli; Claudia Angela Di Silvestri; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Annalisa Orenti; Filippo Randelli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Thrombembolic complications after total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Katharina Barg; Stefan W Schneider; Geert Pagenstert; Marcel Gloyer; Heath B Henninger; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09-28

9.  The scandinavian total ankle replacement: survivorship at 5 and 8 years comparable to other series.

Authors:  Alexia Karantana; Sally Hobson; Sunil Dhar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  [Thromboembolic complications following ankle prosthesis implantation].

Authors:  A Barg; S W Schneider; G Pagenstert; B Hintermann; V Valderrabano
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.