Federico Giuseppe Usuelli1, Claudia Angela Di Silvestri2, Riccardo D'Ambrosi2,3, Annalisa Orenti4, Filippo Randelli5. 1. C.A.S.C.O., IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. fusuelli@gmail.com. 2. C.A.S.C.O., IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. 3. Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. 4. Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Laboratory of Medical Statistics, Epidemiology and Biometry "G.A. Maccacaro", University of Milan, Milan, Italy. 5. Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Centro di Chirurgia dell'Anca e Traumatologia, I.R.C.C.S Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare survival rate and clinical and radiological outcomes of a cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (TAR) between two groups of patients, affected by end-stage ankle arthritis, with or without a pre-operative varus deformity. METHODS: A total of 81 patients (81 ankles) were included in the study and divided in two groups. Group A, "varus" group, includes 11 patients with pre-operative varus deformity of more than 10 ° and group B, "neutral" group, includes 70 patients, with a varus/valgus deformity of less than 10 °. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Short Form (SF)-12 score were used to compare clinical outcomes. Radiological parameters, complications, and survival rate at last follow-up were also recorded. RESULTS: In both groups, all clinical and radiological parameters improved after surgery (p < 0.05) without statistically significant difference. Complications were similar between two groups. Overall in three cases, an implant revision was necessary: 1 in group A (9%) at 3.1 years follow-up and 2 (3%) in group B at 3.8 years, without statistically significant difference (p > 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe varus malalignment should not be considered a contraindication for a mobile-bearing TAR. Nevertheless, TAR in severe deformity should be performed only by experienced surgeons.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare survival rate and clinical and radiological outcomes of a cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (TAR) between two groups of patients, affected by end-stage ankle arthritis, with or without a pre-operative varus deformity. METHODS: A total of 81 patients (81 ankles) were included in the study and divided in two groups. Group A, "varus" group, includes 11 patients with pre-operative varus deformity of more than 10 ° and group B, "neutral" group, includes 70 patients, with a varus/valgus deformity of less than 10 °. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Short Form (SF)-12 score were used to compare clinical outcomes. Radiological parameters, complications, and survival rate at last follow-up were also recorded. RESULTS: In both groups, all clinical and radiological parameters improved after surgery (p < 0.05) without statistically significant difference. Complications were similar between two groups. Overall in three cases, an implant revision was necessary: 1 in group A (9%) at 3.1 years follow-up and 2 (3%) in group B at 3.8 years, without statistically significant difference (p > 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe varus malalignment should not be considered a contraindication for a mobile-bearing TAR. Nevertheless, TAR in severe deformity should be performed only by experienced surgeons.
Entities:
Keywords:
Coronal malalignment; Malalignment; Total ankle replacement; Varus deformity