Literature DB >> 19332881

Drosophila transposon insertions as unknowns for structured inquiry recombination mapping exercises in an undergraduate genetics course.

Jeffrey M Marcus1, Tia M Hughes.   

Abstract

Structured inquiry approaches, in which students receive a Drosophila strain of unknown genotype to analyze and map the constituent mutations, are a common feature of many genetics teaching laboratories. The required crosses frustrate many students because they are aware that they are participating in a fundamentally trivial exercise, as the map locations of the genes are already established and have been recalculated thousands of times by generations of students. We modified the traditional structured inquiry approach to include a novel research experience for the students in our undergraduate genetics laboratories. Students conducted crosses with Drosophila strains carrying P[lacW] transposon insertions in genes without documented recombination map positions, representing a large number of unique, but equivalent genetic unknowns. Using the eye color phenotypes associated with the inserts as visible markers, it is straightforward to calculate recombination map positions for the interrupted loci. Collectively, our students mapped 95 genetic loci on chromosomes 2 and 3. In most cases, the calculated 95% confidence interval for meiotic map location overlapped with the predicted map position based on cytology. The research experience evoked positive student responses and helped students better understand the nature of scientific research for little additional cost or instructor effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19332881      PMCID: PMC2691751          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.101774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  7 in total

1.  Female site-specific transposase-induced recombination: a high-efficiency method for fine mapping mutations on the X chromosome in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Marcus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Learning how scientists work: experiential research projects to promote cell biology learning and scientific process skills.

Authors:  Shubhik K DebBurman
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2002

3.  Education. Scientific teaching.

Authors:  Jo Handelsman; Diane Ebert-May; Robert Beichner; Peter Bruns; Amy Chang; Robert DeHaan; Jim Gentile; Sarah Lauffer; James Stewart; Shirley M Tilghman; William B Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Introducing student inquiry in large introductory genetics classes.

Authors:  Patricia J Pukkila
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Involving undergraduates in the annotation and analysis of global gene expression studies: creation of a maize shoot apical meristem expression database.

Authors:  Brent Buckner; Jon Beck; Kate Browning; Ashleigh Fritz; Lisa Grantham; Eneda Hoxha; Zhian Kamvar; Ashley Lough; Olga Nikolova; Patrick S Schnable; Michael J Scanlon; Diane Janick-Buckner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  H Ochman; A S Gerber; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project gene disruption project: Single P-element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes.

Authors:  A C Spradling; D Stern; A Beaton; E J Rhem; T Laverty; N Mozden; S Misra; G M Rubin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.562

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Using student-generated UV-induced Escherichia coli mutants in a directed inquiry undergraduate genetics laboratory.

Authors:  Frank G Healy; Kevin D Livingstone
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Structured inquiry-based learning: Drosophila GAL4 enhancer trap characterization in an undergraduate laboratory course.

Authors:  Christopher R Dunne; Anthony R Cillo; Danielle R Glick; Katherine John; Cody Johnson; Jaspinder Kanwal; Brian T Malik; Kristina Mammano; Stefan Petrovic; William Pfister; Alexander S Rascoe; Diane Schrom; Scott Shapiro; Jeffrey W Simkins; David Strauss; Rene Talai; John P Tomtishen; Josephine Vargas; Tony Veloz; Thomas O Vogler; Michael E Clenshaw; Devin T Gordon-Hamm; Kathryn L Lee; Elizabeth C Marin
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  A comprehensive faculty, staff, and student training program enhances student perceptions of a course-based research experience at a two-year institution.

Authors:  Thomas D Wolkow; Lisa T Durrenberger; Michael A Maynard; Kylie K Harrall; Lisa M Hines
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.