Literature DB >> 15020401

Introducing student inquiry in large introductory genetics classes.

Patricia J Pukkila1.   

Abstract

An appreciation of genetic principles depends upon understanding the individual curiosity that sparked particular investigations, the creativity involved in imagining alternative outcomes and designing experiments to eliminate these outcomes, and the clarity of thought necessary to convince one's scientific peers of the validity of the conclusions. At large research universities, students usually begin their study of genetics in large lecture classes. It is widely assumed that the lecture format, coupled with the pressures to be certain that students become familiar with the principal conclusions of genetics investigations, constrains most if not all departures from the formats textbooks used to explain these conclusions. Here I present several examples of mechanisms to introduce meaningful student inquiry in an introductory genetics course and to evaluate student creative effort. Most of the examples involve altered student preparation prior to class and additional in-class activities, while a few depend upon a smaller recitation section, which accompanies the course from which the examples have been drawn. I conclude that large introductory classes are suitable venues to teach students how to identify scientific claims, determine the evidence that is essential to eliminate alternative conclusions, and convince their peers of the validity of their arguments.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15020401      PMCID: PMC1470710          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.1.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  2 in total

1.  Inquiry-based undergraduate teaching in the life sciences at large research universities: a perspective on the Boyer Commission Report.

Authors:  William B Wood
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2003

2.  Why Eric Mazur Brings Chaos--Not Chaos Theory--to Physics.

Authors:  J Travis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  9 in total

1.  Genetics computer teaching simulation programs: promise and problems.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Cooperative learning in industrial-sized biology classes.

Authors:  Norris Armstrong; Shu-Mei Chang; Marguerite Brickman
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Drosophila transposon insertions as unknowns for structured inquiry recombination mapping exercises in an undergraduate genetics course.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Marcus; Tia M Hughes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Community-based inquiry improves critical thinking in general education biology.

Authors:  Ian J Quitadamo; Celia L Faiola; James E Johnson; Martha J Kurtz
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Implementation of a Service-learning Module in Medical Microbiology and Cell Biology Classes at an Undergraduate Liberal Arts University.

Authors:  Maia Larios-Sanz; Alexandra D Simmons; Ruth Ann Bagnall; Rosemarie C Rosell
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2011-05-19

6.  A Mind of Their Own: Using Inquiry-based Teaching to Build Critical Thinking Skills and Intellectual Engagement in an Undergraduate Neuroanatomy Course.

Authors:  Ralf R Greenwald; Ian J Quitadamo
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2014-03-15

7.  Student use of out-of-class study groups in an introductory undergraduate biology course.

Authors:  Stephen M Rybczynski; Elisabeth E Schussler
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  Feedback about Teaching in Higher Ed: Neglected Opportunities to Promote Change.

Authors:  Cara Gormally; Mara Evans; Peggy Brickman
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Understanding the Complex Relationship between Critical Thinking and Science Reasoning among Undergraduate Thesis Writers.

Authors:  Jason E Dowd; Robert J Thompson; Leslie A Schiff; Julie A Reynolds
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.325

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.