Literature DB >> 19330441

A putative model of multisensory object representation.

Simon Lacey1, Noa Tal, Amir Amedi, K Sathian.   

Abstract

This review surveys the recent literature on visuo-haptic convergence in the perception of object form, with particular reference to the lateral occipital complex (LOC) and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and discusses how visual imagery or multisensory representations might underlie this convergence. Drawing on a recent distinction between object- and spatially-based visual imagery, we propose a putative model in which LOtv, a subregion of LOC, contains a modality-independent representation of geometric shape that can be accessed either bottom-up from direct sensory inputs or top-down from frontoparietal regions. We suggest that such access is modulated by object familiarity: spatial imagery may be more important for unfamiliar objects and involve IPS foci in facilitating somatosensory inputs to the LOC; by contrast, object imagery may be more critical for familiar objects, being reflected in prefrontal drive to the LOC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19330441      PMCID: PMC3156680          DOI: 10.1007/s10548-009-0087-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  55 in total

1.  Activity and effective connectivity of parietal and occipital cortical regions during haptic shape perception.

Authors:  Scott Peltier; Randall Stilla; Erica Mariola; Stephen LaConte; Xiaoping Hu; K Sathian
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Task-related laterality effects in the lateral occipital complex.

Authors:  Mary-Ellen Large; Adrian Aldcroft; Tutis Vilis
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Journeying beyond classical somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  K Sathian; Simon Lacey
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2007-09

4.  Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex.

Authors:  Amir Amedi; William M Stern; Joan A Camprodon; Felix Bermpohl; Lotfi Merabet; Stephen Rotman; Christopher Hemond; Peter Meijer; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Effective connectivity during haptic perception: a study using Granger causality analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Gopikrishna Deshpande; Xiaoping Hu; Randall Stilla; K Sathian
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Localization of human intraparietal areas AIP, CIP, and LIP using surface orientation and saccadic eye movement tasks.

Authors:  Elisa Shikata; Adam McNamara; Andreas Sprenger; Farsin Hamzei; Volkmar Glauche; Christian Büchel; Ferdinand Binkofski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Vision and touch: multiple or multisensory representations of objects?

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Christine Campbell; K Sathian
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Object-processing neural efficiency differentiates object from spatial visualizers.

Authors:  Michael A Motes; Rafael Malach; Maria Kozhevnikov
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Selective visuo-haptic processing of shape and texture.

Authors:  Randall Stilla; K Sathian
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Cross-modal object recognition is viewpoint-independent.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Andrew Peters; K Sathian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  40 in total

1.  Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities.

Authors:  Nina Gaissert; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of vision and haptics on categorizing common objects.

Authors:  Susan Haag
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-08-19

Review 3.  Dissecting neural circuits for multisensory integration and crossmodal processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.

Authors:  R Joanne Jao; Thomas W James; Karin Harman James
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Object and spatial imagery dimensions in visuo-haptic representations.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Jonathan B Lin; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Enhanced effectiveness in visuo-haptic object-selective brain regions with increasing stimulus salience.

Authors:  Sunah Kim; Thomas W James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Visual stability.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Auditory and tactile frequency representations are co-embedded in modality-defined cortical sensory systems.

Authors:  Md Shoaibur Rahman; Kelly Anne Barnes; Lexi E Crommett; Mark Tommerdahl; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  "Can touch this": Cross-modal shape categorization performance is associated with microstructural characteristics of white matter association pathways.

Authors:  Haemy Lee Masson; Christian Wallraven; Laurent Petit
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition.

Authors:  Matt Craddock; Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.