Literature DB >> 18852681

Object-processing neural efficiency differentiates object from spatial visualizers.

Michael A Motes1, Rafael Malach, Maria Kozhevnikov.   

Abstract

The visual system processes object properties and spatial properties in distinct subsystems, and we hypothesized that this distinction might extend to individual differences in visual processing. We conducted a functional MRI study investigating the neural underpinnings of individual differences in object versus spatial visual processing. Nine participants of high object-processing ability ('object' visualizers) and eight participants of high spatial-processing ability ('spatial' visualizers) were scanned, while they performed an object-processing task. Object visualizers showed lower bilateral neural activity in lateral occipital complex and lower right-lateralized neural activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The data indicate that high object-processing ability is associated with more efficient use of visual-object resources, resulting in less neural activity in the object-processing pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18852681     DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328317f3e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  11 in total

1.  Trade-off in object versus spatial visualization abilities: restriction in the development of visual-processing resources.

Authors:  Maria Kozhevnikov; Olesya Blazhenkova; Michael Becker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

2.  Experts' memory: an ERP study of perceptual expertise effects on encoding and recognition.

Authors:  Grit Herzmann; Tim Curran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

3.  Cognitive styles and mental rotation ability in map learning.

Authors:  Francesca Pazzaglia; Angelica Moè
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-06-15

4.  Spatial imagery in haptic shape perception.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Randall Stilla; Karthik Sreenivasan; Gopikrishna Deshpande; K Sathian
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  A putative model of multisensory object representation.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Noa Tal; Amir Amedi; K Sathian
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Individual differences in solving arithmetic word problems.

Authors:  Sabrina Zarnhofer; Verena Braunstein; Franz Ebner; Karl Koschutnig; Christa Neuper; Manuel Ninaus; Gernot Reishofer; Anja Ischebeck
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.759

7.  Investigating the neural bases for intra-subject cognitive efficiency changes using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Neena K Rao; Michael A Motes; Bart Rypma
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Decoding the direction of imagined visual motion using 7T ultra-high field fMRI.

Authors:  Thomas C Emmerling; Jan Zimmermann; Bettina Sorger; Martin A Frost; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Cognitive style, cortical stimulation, and the conversion hypothesis.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Roy H Hamilton; Samuel B Messing; Jennifer H Desantis; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Altered Spontaneous Regional Brain Activity in the Insula and Visual Areas of Professional Traditional Chinese Pingju Opera Actors.

Authors:  Weitao Zhang; Fangshi Zhao; Wen Qin; Lin Ma
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.