Literature DB >> 18265834

Vision and touch: multiple or multisensory representations of objects?

Simon Lacey1, Christine Campbell, K Sathian.   

Abstract

The relationship between visually and haptically derived representations of objects is an important question in multisensory processing and, increasingly, in mental representation. We review evidence for the format and properties of these representations, and address possible theoretical models. We explore the relevance of visual imagery processes and highlight areas for further research, including the neglected question of asymmetric performance in the visuo-haptic cross-modal memory paradigm. We conclude that the weight of evidence suggests the existence of a multisensory representation, spatial in format, and flexibly accessible by both bottom-up and top-down inputs, although efficient comparison between modality-specific representations cannot entirely be ruled out.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18265834     DOI: 10.1068/p5850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  26 in total

Review 1.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

2.  A distributed cortical representation underlies crossmodal object recognition in rats.

Authors:  Boyer D Winters; James M Reid
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Are surface properties integrated into visuohaptic object representations?

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Jenelle Hall; K Sathian
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Enhanced effectiveness in visuo-haptic object-selective brain regions with increasing stimulus salience.

Authors:  Sunah Kim; Thomas W James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Haptic identification of raised-line drawings: high visuospatial imagers outperform low visuospatial imagers.

Authors:  Samuel Lebaz; Christophe Jouffrais; Delphine Picard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-22

Review 6.  Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework.

Authors:  Autumn B Hostetter; Martha W Alibali
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

7.  Linguistic asymmetry, egocentric anchoring, and sensory modality as factors for the observed association between time and space perception.

Authors:  Eunice E Hang Choy; Him Cheung
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-05-17

8.  Cross-modal object recognition and dynamic weighting of sensory inputs in a fish.

Authors:  Sarah Schumacher; Theresa Burt de Perera; Johanna Thenert; Gerhard von der Emde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Peter Flueckiger; Randall Stilla; Michael Lava; K Sathian
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Multisensory visual-tactile object related network in humans: insights gained using a novel crossmodal adaptation approach.

Authors:  Noa Tal; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.