Literature DB >> 19330158

Nonlinear response for neoplastic transformation following low doses of low let radiation.

J Leslie Redpath1.   

Abstract

There are now several independent studies that indicate that the dose-response for the endpoint of radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro is non-linear for low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. At low doses (<10 cGy) the transformation frequency drops below that seen spontaneously. Importantly, this observation has been made using fluoroscopic energy x-rays, a commonly used modality in diagnostic radiology, the practice of which is responsible for the majority of radiation exposure to the general public. Since the transformation frequency is reduced over a large dose range (0.1 to 10cGy) it is likely that multiple mechanisms are involved and that the relative contribution of these may vary with dose. These include the killing of a subpopulation of cells prone to spontaneous transformation at the lowest doses, and the induction of DNA repair at somewhat higher doses. Protective effects of low doses of low LET radiation on other cancer-relevant endpoints in vitro and in vivo have also been observed by several independent laboratories. These observations strongly suggest that the linear-nonthreshold dose-response model is unlikely to apply to the induction of cancer by low doses of low LET radiation in humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low dose; adaptive response; neoplastic transformation; radiation

Year:  2005        PMID: 19330158      PMCID: PMC2657837          DOI: 10.2201/nonlin.003.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med        ISSN: 1540-1421


  41 in total

1.  Interaction between radiation-induced adaptive response and bystander mutagenesis in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Hongning Zhou; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Charles R Geard; David J Brenner; Eric J Hall; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Adaptive response in embryogenesis: V. Existence of two efficient dose-rate ranges for 0.3 Gy of priming irradiation to adapt mouse fetuses.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Harumi Ohyama; Yi Shang; Kaoru Tanaka; Shiro Aizawa; Osami Yukawa; Isamu Hayata
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Helmut Schöllnberger; Vernon Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01

4.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Influence of gamma irradiation on the development of neoplastic disease in mice. III. Dose-rate effects.

Authors:  R L Ullrich; J B Storer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Mechanisms of suppression of neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low LET radiation.

Authors:  M C Pant; X-Y Liao; Q Lu; S Molloi; E Elmore; J L Redpath
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Neoplastic transformation of human hybrid cells by gamma radiation: a quantitative assay.

Authors:  J L Redpath; C Sun; M Colman; E J Stanbridge
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A reanalysis of thyroid neoplasms in the Israeli tinea capitis study accounting for dose uncertainties.

Authors:  Jay H Lubin; Daniel W Schafer; Elaine Ron; Marilyn Stovall; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications.

Authors:  S Wolff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters.

Authors:  Daniel P Hayes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Alexander M Vaiserman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  O-Arm-Navigated, Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional CT Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in Treatment of Osteoid Osteoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tian-Long Wang; Yi-Ping Luo; Zi-Fei Zhou; Jun-Feng Liu; Xiao-Dong Hou; Shao-Hua Jia; Long-Po Zheng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  Low-dose or low-dose-rate ionizing radiation-induced bioeffects in animal models.

Authors:  Feng Ru Tang; Weng Keong Loke; Boo Cheong Khoo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.