Literature DB >> 19330142

The bystander effect: recent developments and implications for understanding the dose response.

R E J Mitchel1.   

Abstract

The bystander effect refers to the biological response of a cell resulting from an event in an adjacent or nearby cell. Such effects depend on intercellular communication and amplify the consequences of the original event. These responses are of particular interest in the assessment of ionizing radiation risk because at public or occupational exposure levels not every cell receives a radiation track. Current radiation protection regulations and practices are based on the assumption of a linear increase in risk with dose, including low doses where not all cells are hit. Mechanisms that amplify biological effects are inconsistent with these assumptions. Evidence suggests that there are two different bystander effects in mammalian cells. In one type, a radiation track in one cell leads to damaging, mutagenic, and sometimes lethal events in adjacent, unhit cells. In the other type, a radiation track in one cell leads to an adaptive response in bystander cells, increasing resistance to spontaneous or radiation-induced events. This paper describes some of the data for radiation-induced bystander effects in vitro and correlates that data with in vitro and in vivo observations of risk at low doses. The data suggest that protective effects, including beneficial bystander effects, outweigh detrimental effects at doses below about 100 mGy, but that the reverse is true above this threshold.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trp53; bystander effects; cancer; ionizing radiation; mice

Year:  2004        PMID: 19330142      PMCID: PMC2657488          DOI: 10.1080/15401420490507512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med        ISSN: 1540-1421


  34 in total

1.  Initiation of apoptosis in cells exposed to medium from the progeny of irradiated cells: a possible mechanism for bystander-induced genomic instability?

Authors:  F M Lyng; C B Seymour; C Mothersill
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Increased bystander mutagenic effect in DNA double-strand break repair-deficient mammalian cells.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; L Huo; J B Little
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; J B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Decreased incidence of thymic lymphoma in AKR mice as a result of chronic, fractionated low-dose total-body X irradiation.

Authors:  K Ishii; Y Hosoi; S Yamada; T Ono; K Sakamoto
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Induction of an adaptive response against spontaneous neoplastic transformation in vitro by low-dose gamma radiation.

Authors:  J L Redpath; R J Antoniono
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Radiation-induced adaptive response for protection against micronucleus formation and neoplastic transformation in C3H 10T1/2 mouse embryo cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; G P Raaphorst; R E Mitchel
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidine.

Authors:  G Olivieri; J Bodycote; S Wolff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Relative contribution of bystander and targeted cell killing to the low-dose region of the radiation dose-response curve.

Authors:  C B Seymour; C Mothersill
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Low doses of radiation increase the latency of spontaneous lymphomas and spinal osteosarcomas in cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel; J S Jackson; D P Morrison; S M Carlisle
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Cancer mortality survey in a spa area (Misasa, Japan) with a high radon background.

Authors:  M Mifune; T Sobue; H Arimoto; Y Komoto; S Kondo; H Tanooka
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1992-01
View more
  6 in total

1.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Cancer and low dose responses in vivo: implications for radiation protection.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 5.  Low-dose or low-dose-rate ionizing radiation-induced bioeffects in animal models.

Authors:  Feng Ru Tang; Weng Keong Loke; Boo Cheong Khoo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Biotransformation of Doxorubicin Promotes Resilience in Simplified Intestinal Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Ryan A Blaustein; Patrick C Seed; Erica M Hartmann
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.389

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.