Literature DB >> 19329796

Determinants of exposure to metalworking fluid aerosols: a literature review and analysis of reported measurements.

Donguk Park1, Patrica A Stewart, Joseph B Coble.   

Abstract

An extensive literature review of published metalworking fluid (MWF) aerosol measurement data was conducted to identify the major determinants that may affect exposure to aerosol fractions (total or inhalable, thoracic and respirable) and mass median diameters (MMDs). The identification of determinants was conducted through published studies and analysis of published measurement levels. For the latter, weighted arithmetic means (WAMs) by number of measurements were calculated and compared using analysis of variance and t-tests. The literature review found that the major factors affecting aerosol exposure levels were, primarily, decade, type of industry, operation and fluid and engineering control measures. Our analysis of total aerosol levels found a significant decline in measured levels from an average of 5.36 mg m(-3) prior to the 1970s and 2.52 mg m(-3) in the 1970s to 1.21 mg m(-3) in the 1980s, 0.50 mg m(-3) in the 1990s and 0.55 mg m(-3) in the 2000s. Significant declines from the 1990s to the 2000s also were found in thoracic fraction levels (0.48 versus 0.40 mg m(-3)), but not for the respirable fraction. The WAMs for the auto (1.47 mg m(-3)) and auto parts manufacturing industry (1.83 mg m(-3)) were significantly higher than that for small-job machine shops (0.68 mg m(-3)). In addition, a significant difference in the thoracic WAM was found between the automotive industry (0.46 mg m(-3)) and small-job machine shops (0.32 mg m(-3)). Operation type, in particular, grinding, was a significant factor affecting the total aerosol fraction [grinding operations (1.75 mg m(-3)) versus other machining (0.95 mg m(-3))], but the levels associated with these operations were not statistically different for either the thoracic or the respirable fractions. Across all decades, the total aerosol fraction for straight oils (1.49 mg m(-3)) was higher than for other fluid types (soluble = 1.08 mg m(-3), synthetic = 0.52 mg m(-3) and semisynthetic = 0.50 mg m(-3)). Fluid type was also found to be partly associated with differences in the respirable fraction level. We found that the total aerosols were measured by a variety of sampling media, devices and analytical methods. This diversity of approaches makes interpretation of the study results difficult. In conclusion, both the literature review and the measurement data analyzed found that decade and type of industry, operation and fluid were important determinants of total aerosol exposure. Industry type and fluid type were associated with differences in exposure to the thoracic and respirable fraction levels, respectively.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19329796      PMCID: PMC2662095          DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mep005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  47 in total

1.  Metalworking fluid exposures in small machine shops: an overview.

Authors:  G M Piacitelli; W K Sieber; D M O'Brien; R T Hughes; R A Glaser; J D Catalano
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  Characterization of metalworking fluid aerosols in bearing grinding operations.

Authors:  F S Rosenthal; B L Yeagy
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2001 May-Jun

3.  Mortality at an automotive engine foundry and machining complex.

Authors:  R M Park
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  An evaluation of short-term exposures to metalworking fluids in small machine shops.

Authors:  D M O'Brien; G M Piacitelli; W K Sieber; R T Hughes; J D Catalano
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2001 May-Jun

5.  Experimental and analytical efforts to characterize cutting fluid mist formation and behavior in machining.

Authors:  Donna J Michalek; Wilson W-S Hii; Jichao Sun; Kenneth L Gunter; John W Sutherland
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2003-11

6.  Size distribution of mist generated during metal machining.

Authors:  J Thornburg; D Leith
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2000-08

7.  Exposure-response models based on extended follow-up of a cohort mortality study in the automobile industry.

Authors:  E A Eisen; J Bardin; R Gore; S R Woskie; M F Hallock; R R Monson
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Effects of fluid composition on mist composition.

Authors:  Eugene M White; William E Lucke
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2003-11

9.  Risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancers in a case-cohort study of autoworkers exposed to metalworking fluids.

Authors:  A Zeka; E A Eisen; D Kriebel; R Gore; D H Wegman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Occupational exposure to metalworking fluid mist and sump fluid contaminants.

Authors:  A T Simpson; M Stear; J A Groves; M Piney; S D Bradley; S Stagg; B Crook
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2003-01
View more
  12 in total

1.  Developing estimates of frequency and intensity of exposure to three types of metalworking fluids in a population-based case-control study of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Melissa C Friesen; Dong-Uk Park; Joanne S Colt; Dalsu Baris; Molly Schwenn; Margaret R Karagas; Karla R Armenti; Alison Johnson; Debra T Silverman; Patricia A Stewart
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Workplace measurements by the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration since 1979: descriptive analysis and potential uses for exposure assessment.

Authors:  J Lavoue; M C Friesen; I Burstyn
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-09-05

3.  Estimation of the probability of exposure to machining fluids in a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Dong-Uk Park; Joanne S Colt; Dalsu Baris; Molly Schwenn; Margaret R Karagas; Karla R Armenti; Alison Johnson; Debra T Silverman; Patricia A Stewart
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Development of a source-exposure matrix for occupational exposure assessment of electromagnetic fields in the INTEROCC study.

Authors:  Javier Vila; Joseph D Bowman; Jordi Figuerola; David Moriña; Laurel Kincl; Lesley Richardson; Elisabeth Cardis
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 5.  New Opportunities in Exposure Assessment of Occupational Epidemiology: Use of Measurements to Aid Exposure Reconstruction in Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Pamela J Dopart; Melissa C Friesen
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

6.  0084 A Case-Control Study of Occupational Exposure to Metalworking Fluids and Bladder Cancer Risk among Men.

Authors:  Joanne Colt; Melissa Friesen; Patricia Stewart; Park Donguk; Alison Johnson; Molly Schwenn; Margaret Karagas; Karla Armenti; Richard Waddell; Castine Verrill; Mary Ward; Laura Beane Freeman; Lee Moore; Dalsu Baris; Debra Silverman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  A case-control study of occupational exposure to metalworking fluids and bladder cancer risk among men.

Authors:  Joanne S Colt; Melissa C Friesen; Patricia A Stewart; Park Donguk; Alison Johnson; Molly Schwenn; Margaret R Karagas; Karla Armenti; Richard Waddell; Castine Verrill; Mary H Ward; Laura E Beane Freeman; Lee E Moore; Stella Koutros; Dalsu Baris; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis Due to Metalworking Fluid Aerosols.

Authors:  P Sherwood Burge
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 9.  Estimating Benzene Exposure Level over Time and by Industry Type through a Review of Literature on Korea.

Authors:  Donguk Park; Sangjun Choi; Kwonchul Ha; Hyejung Jung; Chungsik Yoon; Dong-Hee Koh; Seunghun Ryu; Soogeun Kim; Dongmug Kang; Kyemook Yoo
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2015-08-05

10.  The occupational exposure limit for fluid aerosol generated in metalworking operations: limitations and recommendations.

Authors:  Donguk Park
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2012-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.