Literature DB >> 11434442

Metalworking fluid exposures in small machine shops: an overview.

G M Piacitelli1, W K Sieber, D M O'Brien, R T Hughes, R A Glaser, J D Catalano.   

Abstract

Sampling was conducted in 79 small machine shops to assess airborne exposures to metalworking fluids (MWFs). Measured exposures were compared with data from the literature and exposure criteria currently recommended by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration MWF Standards Advisory Committee. Sixty-two percent of 942 personal samples collected were less than the recommended exposure limit (REL) of 0.50 mg/m3 for total particulate. However, at least 1 sample exceeded the REL in 61 of the 79 facilities studied; 100% of the samples collected in 10 shops were greater than the REL. Similar trends were found for thoracic particulate exposures where 75% of 238 samples were below the thoracic particulate REL of 0.40 mg/m3. The ratio between thoracic and total particulate for 238 paired samples was 0.55 (r2=0.73). Workers exposed to straight fluids had the highest exposures (GM=0.67 mg/m3) when compared with workers exposed to other classes of MWFs. The highest exposures were measured for grinding and hobbing (GM=0.67 and 0.60 mg/m3, respectively). Measurements using personal impactors indicated that particle size distributions of MWF aerosols had an average mass median aerodynamic diameter of 5.3 microm. Straight oils and soluble fluids tended to be associated with larger particles than were other fluid types; grinding and turning produced the largest particles, whereas hobbing resulted in the smallest. In general, exposures were similar in magnitude and particle size to those previously reported in large automotive plants. Therefore, workers in these small shops may have risks of adverse health effects similar to those demonstrated in the automotive industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11434442     DOI: 10.1080/15298660108984638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIHAJ        ISSN: 1529-8663


  4 in total

1.  Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; T Renee Anthony; Michael Van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-09-29

2.  An assessment of dermal exposure to semi-synthetic metal working fluids by different methods to group workers for an epidemiological study on dermatitis.

Authors:  B van Wendel de Joode; E P B Bierman; D H Brouwer; J Spithoven; H Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Determinants of exposure to metalworking fluid aerosols: a literature review and analysis of reported measurements.

Authors:  Donguk Park; Patrica A Stewart; Joseph B Coble
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-04

4.  The occupational exposure limit for fluid aerosol generated in metalworking operations: limitations and recommendations.

Authors:  Donguk Park
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2012-03-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.