Literature DB >> 27827378

Development of a source-exposure matrix for occupational exposure assessment of electromagnetic fields in the INTEROCC study.

Javier Vila1,2,3, Joseph D Bowman4, Jordi Figuerola1, David Moriña1, Laurel Kincl5, Lesley Richardson6, Elisabeth Cardis1,2,3.   

Abstract

To estimate occupational exposures to electromagnetic fields (EMF) for the INTEROCC study, a database of source-based measurements extracted from published and unpublished literature resources had been previously constructed. The aim of the current work was to summarize these measurements into a source-exposure matrix (SEM), accounting for their quality and relevance. A novel methodology for combining available measurements was developed, based on order statistics and log-normal distribution characteristics. Arithmetic and geometric means, and estimates of variability and maximum exposure were calculated by EMF source, frequency band and dosimetry type. The mean estimates were weighted by our confidence in the pooled measurements. The SEM contains confidence-weighted mean and maximum estimates for 312 EMF exposure sources (from 0 Hz to 300 GHz). Operator position geometric mean electric field levels for radiofrequency (RF) sources ranged between 0.8 V/m (plasma etcher) and 320 V/m (RF sealer), while magnetic fields ranged from 0.02 A/m (speed radar) to 0.6 A/m (microwave heating). For extremely low frequency sources, electric fields ranged between 0.2 V/m (electric forklift) and 11,700 V/m (high-voltage transmission line-hotsticks), whereas magnetic fields ranged between 0.14 μT (visual display terminals) and 17 μT (tungsten inert gas welding). The methodology developed allowed the construction of the first EMF-SEM and may be used to summarize similar exposure data for other physical or chemical agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27827378      PMCID: PMC5573206          DOI: 10.1038/jes.2016.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  41 in total

1.  Improved use of workplace exposure data in the regulatory risk assessment of chemicals within Europe.

Authors:  C D Money; S A Margary
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2002-04

2.  Issues when modeling benzene, toluene, and xylene exposures using a literature database.

Authors:  Misty J Hein; Martha A Waters; Edwin van Wijngaarden; James A Deddens; Patricia A Stewart
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Respiratory symptoms, sensitization, and exposure response relationships in spray painters exposed to isocyanates.

Authors:  Anjoeka Pronk; Liesbeth Preller; Monika Raulf-Heimsoth; Irene C L Jonkers; Jan-Willem Lammers; Inge M Wouters; Gert Doekes; Adam V Wisnewski; Dick Heederik
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  On summarizing group exposures in risk assessment: is an arithmetic mean or a geometric mean more appropriate?

Authors:  K S Crump
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 5.  Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures.

Authors:  B G Armstrong
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  A system linking occupation history questionnaire data and magnetic field monitoring data.

Authors:  K D Burau; B Huang; L W Whitehead; G M Delclos; T D Downs
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun

7.  Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Premature Rupture of Membranes.

Authors:  Maeve E Wallace; Katherine L Grantz; Danping Liu; Yeyi Zhu; Sung Soo Kim; Pauline Mendola
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Lead exposure in US worksites: A literature review and development of an occupational lead exposure database from the published literature.

Authors:  Dong-Hee Koh; Sarah J Locke; Yu-Cheng Chen; Mark P Purdue; Melissa C Friesen
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  The two-dimensional Monte Carlo: a new methodologic paradigm for dose reconstruction for epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; F Owen Hoffman; Eduard Hofer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  A Source-based Measurement Database for Occupational Exposure Assessment of Electromagnetic Fields in the INTEROCC Study: A Literature Review Approach.

Authors:  Javier Vila; Joseph D Bowman; Lesley Richardson; Laurel Kincl; Dave L Conover; Dave McLean; Simon Mann; Paolo Vecchia; Martie van Tongeren; Elisabeth Cardis
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-10-21
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  New Opportunities in Exposure Assessment of Occupational Epidemiology: Use of Measurements to Aid Exposure Reconstruction in Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Pamela J Dopart; Melissa C Friesen
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

2.  Development of a Job-Exposure Matrix for Assessment of Occupational Exposure to High-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields (3 kHz-300 GHz).

Authors:  Lucile Migault; Joseph D Bowman; Hans Kromhout; Jordi Figuerola; Isabelle Baldi; Ghislaine Bouvier; Michelle C Turner; Elisabeth Cardis; Javier Vila
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Measurement and Exposure Assessment of Intermediate Frequency Magnetic Fields From Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) Gates in Libraries.

Authors:  Miwa Ikuyo; Kaoru Esaki; Atsuko Aimoto; Kanako Wake; Sachiko Yamaguchi-Sekino; Noriko Kojimahara; Yukihisa Suzuki; Masao Taki
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-12

4.  Occupational exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields and brain tumor risk in the INTEROCC study: An individualized assessment approach.

Authors:  Javier Vila; Michelle C Turner; Esther Gracia-Lavedan; Jordi Figuerola; Joseph D Bowman; Laurel Kincl; Lesley Richardson; Geza Benke; Martine Hours; Daniel Krewski; Dave McLean; Marie-Elise Parent; Siegal Sadetzki; Klaus Schlaefer; Brigitte Schlehofer; Joachim Schüz; Jack Siemiatycki; Martie van Tongeren; Elisabeth Cardis
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 9.621

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.