Pamela J Dopart1, Melissa C Friesen2. 1. Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. 2. Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. friesenmc@mail.nih.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Exposure assessment efforts in population-based studies are increasingly incorporating measurements. The published literature was reviewed to identify the measurement sources and the approaches used to incorporate measurements into these efforts. RECENT FINDINGS: The variety of occupations and industries in these studies made collecting participant-specific measurements impractical. Thus, the starting point was often the compilation of large databases of measurements from inspections, published literature, and other exposure surveys. These measurements usually represented multiple occupations, industries, and worksites, and spanned multiple decades. Measurements were used both qualitatively and quantitatively, dependent on the coverage and quality of the data. Increasingly, statistical models were used to derive job-, industry-, time period-, and other determinant-specific exposure concentrations. Quantitative measurement-based approaches are increasingly replacing expert judgment, which facilitates the development of quantitative exposure-response associations. Evaluations of potential biases in these measurement sources, and their representativeness of typical exposure situations, warrant additional examination.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Exposure assessment efforts in population-based studies are increasingly incorporating measurements. The published literature was reviewed to identify the measurement sources and the approaches used to incorporate measurements into these efforts. RECENT FINDINGS: The variety of occupations and industries in these studies made collecting participant-specific measurements impractical. Thus, the starting point was often the compilation of large databases of measurements from inspections, published literature, and other exposure surveys. These measurements usually represented multiple occupations, industries, and worksites, and spanned multiple decades. Measurements were used both qualitatively and quantitatively, dependent on the coverage and quality of the data. Increasingly, statistical models were used to derive job-, industry-, time period-, and other determinant-specific exposure concentrations. Quantitative measurement-based approaches are increasingly replacing expert judgment, which facilitates the development of quantitative exposure-response associations. Evaluations of potential biases in these measurement sources, and their representativeness of typical exposure situations, warrant additional examination.
Authors: Ana M García; M Carmen González-Galarzo; Timo Kauppinen; Georges L Delclos; Fernando G Benavides Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Melissa C Friesen; Dong-Uk Park; Joanne S Colt; Dalsu Baris; Molly Schwenn; Margaret R Karagas; Karla R Armenti; Alison Johnson; Debra T Silverman; Patricia A Stewart Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Benjamin Kendzia; Beate Pesch; Dorothea Koppisch; Rainer Van Gelder; Katrin Pitzke; Wolfgang Zschiesche; Thomas Behrens; Tobias Weiss; Jack Siemiatycki; Jerome Lavoué; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Roger Stamm; Thomas Brüning Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Susan Peters; Roel Vermeulen; Ann Olsson; Rainer Van Gelder; Benjamin Kendzia; Raymond Vincent; Barbara Savary; Nick Williams; Torill Woldbæk; Jérôme Lavoué; Domenico Cavallo; Andrea Cattaneo; Dario Mirabelli; Nils Plato; Dirk Dahmann; Joelle Fevotte; Beate Pesch; Thomas Brüning; Kurt Straif; Hans Kromhout Journal: Ann Occup Hyg Date: 2011-10-11
Authors: Melissa C Friesen; Bryan A Bassig; Roel Vermeulen; Xiao-Ou Shu; Mark P Purdue; Patricia A Stewart; Yong-Bing Xiang; Wong-Ho Chow; Bu-Tian Ji; Gong Yang; Martha S Linet; Wei Hu; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng; Nathaniel Rothman; Qing Lan Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: L T Stayner; J J Collins; Y L Guo; D Heederik; M Kogevinas; K Steenland; C Wesseling; P A Demers Journal: Curr Environ Health Rep Date: 2017-09
Authors: Pabitra R Josse; Stella Koutros; Adonina Tardon; Nathaniel Rothman; Debra T Silverman; Melissa C Friesen Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 2.779
Authors: Tuija M Mikkola; Mikaela B von Bonsdorff; Minna K Salonen; Hannu Kautiainen; Leena Ala-Mursula; Svetlana Solovieva; Eira Viikari-Juntura; Johan G Eriksson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Nicole C Deziel; Laura E Beane Freeman; Jane A Hoppin; Kent Thomas; Catherine C Lerro; Rena R Jones; Cynthia J Hines; Aaron Blair; Barry I Graubard; Jay H Lubin; Dale P Sandler; Honglei Chen; Gabriella Andreotti; Michael C Alavanja; Melissa C Friesen Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 5.563