Literature DB >> 19329787

Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of conventional, central, and horizontal single-bundle virtual graft positions.

Robert H Brophy1, Andrew D Pearle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional endoscopic single-bundle transtibial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction from the posterolateral tibial footprint to the anteromedial femoral footprint results in a vertical graft. A more oblique horizontal graft from the anteromedial tibial footprint to the posterolateral femoral footprint may offer a better alternative for all endoscopic ACL reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: When compared with a conventional ACL single-bundle position, the horizontal graft ACL position has more obliquity and so undergoes a greater change in length during anterior translation and internal rotation. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: A computer navigation system was used to acquire kinematic data during a flexion-extension cycle and outline the anteromedial and posterolateral aspects of the tibial and femoral footprints on 5 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. Three virtual graft positions were defined: conventional (posterolateral tibia-anteromedial femur), central, and horizontal (anteromedial tibia- posterolateral femur). After transection of the ACL, the obliquity, anisometry, absolute length change, and apparent strain were computed for each graft position during the Lachman test, the anterior drawer test, and internal rotation at 0 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion.
RESULTS: The horizontal position was more oblique than the other positions (P < .05). There were no differences in anisometry. The horizontal position elongated more than the other positions during the Lachman test (P < .05) and more than the conventional position during the anterior drawer test (P = .009). During internal rotation at 30 degrees flexion, the horizontal position elongated more than the other positions (P < .05). The central and horizontal positions had more apparent strain than that of the vertical position during the Lachman test and internal rotation (P < .05); no significant difference was found during the anterior drawer test.
CONCLUSION: In ACL-deficient cadaveric knees, the horizontal graft position has greater obliquity and so undergoes greater elongation without increased apparent strain when compared to the central graft position, in response to anterior translation and internal rotation maneuvers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Horizontal graft placement of a single-bundle ACL may result in greater control of translation and rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19329787     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509333007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  24 in total

1.  Anteromedial versus central single-bundle graft position: which anatomic graft position to choose?

Authors:  Michael B Cross; Volker Musahl; Asheesh Bedi; Padhraig O'Loughlin; Sommer Hammoud; Eduardo Suero; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of tunnel positions in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using computer navigation.

Authors:  James E Voos; Volker Musahl; Travis G Maak; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparing the direct versus indirect femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  J P van der List; H A Zuiderbaan; D H Nawabi; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effect of ACL reconstruction graft size on simulated Lachman testing: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Robert W Westermann; Brian R Wolf; Jacob M Elkins
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

5.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner deficiency results in a reverse pivot shift.

Authors:  Frank A Petrigliano; Clayton G Lane; Eduardo M Suero; Answorth A Allen; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Effect of meniscal loss on knee stability after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Frank A Petrigliano; Volker Musahl; Eduardo M Suero; Musa Citak; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Anatomic single-bundle ACL surgery: consequences of tibial tunnel diameter and drill-guide angle on tibial footprint coverage.

Authors:  H Van der Bracht; L Verhelst; B Stuyts; B Page; J Bellemans; P Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  High incidence of partially anatomic tunnel placement in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Achtnich; Francesco Ranuccio; Lukas Willinger; Jonas Pogorzelski; Andreas B Imhoff; Sepp Braun; Elmar Herbst
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.