Literature DB >> 27192715

A Survey on Main Semen Parameters in Natural Pregnancy and Intrauterine Insemination: Are There Any Significant Differences?

Roshanak Aboutorabi1, Soudabeh Zamani1, Yasaman Zarrin1, Fatemeh Sadat Mostafavi1.   

Abstract

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a treatment of choice compared with other invasive and expensive techniques of assisted reproduction. Sperm quality is used to predict its outcome and success. Establishing threshold levels for sperm parameters is useful to avoid spending time and money to do other assisted reproductive techniques. This study was carried out to compare various semen parameters in a group of men eligible to participate in an IUI program with those of fertile men whose wives were pregnant at the time of the study. Two hundred and thirty-four semen samples were evaluated from subfertile men whose partners were candidates for IUI and 234 semen samples were evaluated from fertile men whose partners were pregnant less than 12 weeks. To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the main semen parameters, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used. Normal sperm morphology is more sensitive and specific compared with its progressive motility and concentration. No significant differences in various semen parameters of fertile men and those of the male partners of IUI candidates were observed. ROC analysis identified that sperm normal morphology using strict criteria may be a good indicator of fertility status in men. No significant difference in various semen parameters between the male partners of IUI candidates and the fertile men was seen. However, utilizing ROC curves, sperm morphology using strict criteria could be a good predictor of fertility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Isfahan; assisted reproduction; intrauterine insemination; semen parameters

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27192715      PMCID: PMC5987951          DOI: 10.1177/1557988316647966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Mens Health        ISSN: 1557-9883


  30 in total

1.  Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds.

Authors:  R Menkveld; W Y Wong; C J Lombard; A M Wetzels; C M Thomas; H M Merkus; R P Steegers-Theunissen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis.

Authors:  A Campana; D Sakkas; A Stalberg; P G Bianchi; I Comte; T Pache; D Walker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Vitrification of neat semen alters sperm parameters and DNA integrity.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Khalili; Maryam Adib; Iman Halvaei; Ali Nabi
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 1.510

Review 4.  Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Marie Hélène Heraud; Nadège Grenier; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Pierre Sanguinet; Henri Copin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988-1989).

Authors:  P Thonneau; S Marchand; A Tallec; M L Ferial; B Ducot; J Lansac; P Lopes; J M Tabaste; A Spira
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Janne-Meije van Weert; Sjoerd Repping; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Fulco van der Veen; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Ben W J Mol
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Sperm nuclear DNA in ejaculates of fertile and infertile men: correlation with semen parameters.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Khalili; Fatima Aghaie-Maybodi; Morteza Anvari; Ali Reza Talebi
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.510

8.  Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  T F Kruger; R Menkveld; F S Stander; C J Lombard; J P Van der Merwe; J A van Zyl; K Smith
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Efficacy of the motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) in predicting pregnancy after intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Livia D Akl; Joao Batista A Oliveira; Claudia G Petersen; Ana L Mauri; Liliane F I Silva; Fabiana C Massaro; Ricardo L R Baruffi; Mario Cavagna; Jose G Franco
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Geographic differences in semen quality of fertile U.S. males.

Authors:  Shanna H Swan; Charlene Brazil; Erma Z Drobnis; Fan Liu; Robin L Kruse; Maureen Hatch; J Bruce Redmon; Christina Wang; James W Overstreet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  The statistical foundation of the reference population for semen analysis included in the sixth edition of the WHO manual: a critical reappraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Alessio Paffoni; Edgardo Somigliana; Luca Boeri; Paola Viganò
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 6.353

2.  Intrauterine insemination cycles: prediction of success and thresholds for poor prognosis and futile care.

Authors:  Alessandra J Ainsworth; Emily P Barnard; Sarah C Baumgarten; Amy L Weaver; Zaraq Khan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Predictors of pregnancy and time to pregnancy in infertile men with idiopathic oligoasthenospermia pre- and post-coenzyme Q10 therapy.

Authors:  Ahmed T Alahmar; Roozbeh Naemi
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.532

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.