Literature DB >> 19325963

Development of a peer teaching-assessment program and a peer observation and evaluation tool.

Jennifer M Trujillo1, Margarita V DiVall, Judith Barr, Michael Gonyeau, Jenny A Van Amburgh, S James Matthews, Donna Qualters.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a formalized, comprehensive, peer-driven teaching assessment program and a valid and reliable assessment tool.
METHODS: A volunteer taskforce was formed and a peer-assessment program was developed using a multistep, sequential approach and the Peer Observation and Evaluation Tool (POET). A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the efficiency and practicality of the process and to establish interrater reliability of the tool. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated.
RESULTS: ICCs for 8 separate lectures evaluated by 2-3 observers ranged from 0.66 to 0.97, indicating good interrater reliability of the tool.
CONCLUSION: Our peer assessment program for large classroom teaching, which includes a valid and reliable evaluation tool, is comprehensive, feasible, and can be adopted by other schools of pharmacy.

Keywords:  large classroom teaching; peer assessment; peer observation and evaluation tool

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19325963      PMCID: PMC2661155          DOI: 10.5688/aj7206147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  8 in total

1.  Observing students in a clinical setting.

Authors:  D M Qualters
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  A comparison of student evaluations and faculty peer evaluations of faculty lectures.

Authors:  M H Leamon; M E Servis; R D Canning; R C Searles
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Using a peer evaluation system to assess faculty performance and competence.

Authors:  Marcy E Rosenbaum; Kristi J Ferguson; Clarence D Kreiter; Cynda A Johnson
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  The planning and implementation of a faculty peer review teaching project.

Authors:  Karen K Schultz; David Latif
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Evaluation of an evidence-based peer teaching assessment program.

Authors:  Laura B Hansen; Marianne McCollum; Susan M Paulsen; Thomas Cyr; Catherine L Jarvis; Glenda Tate; Ralph J Altiere
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Pharmacy students' perceptions of a teaching evaluation process.

Authors:  Christopher K Surratt; Shane P Desselle
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 7.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Peer evaluation of teaching: an approach whose time has come.

Authors:  M S Nelson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.893

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Follow-up assessment of a faculty peer observation and evaluation program.

Authors:  Margarita DiVall; Judith Barr; Michael Gonyeau; S James Matthews; Jenny Van Amburgh; Donna Qualters; Jennifer Trujillo
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Recognition of teaching excellence.

Authors:  Dana Hammer; Peggy Piascik; Melissa Medina; Amy Pittenger; Renee Rose; Freddy Creekmore; Robert Soltis; Alicia Bouldin; Lindsay Schwarz; Steven Scott
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Response to the Integration of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process into a Comprehensive Disease Management Course Series.

Authors:  Michael Gonyeau; Margarita DiVall; Michael Conley; Jason Lancaster
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Evaluation of a Teaching Assistant Program for Third-Year Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  Courtney L Bradley; Julia Khanova; Kelly L Scolaro
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Assessment of full-time faculty preceptors by colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States and Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Harold L Kirschenbaum; Tina Zerilli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  A Faculty Toolkit for Formative Assessment in Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Greg L Alston; Eleanora Bird; Shauna M Buring; Katherine A Kelley; Nanci L Murphy; Lauren S Schlesselman; Cindy D Stowe; Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Impact and Attitudes about Peer Review of Teaching in a Canadian Pharmacy School.

Authors:  Cynthia L Richard; Elaine Lillie; Kaitlin Mathias; Thomas McFarlane
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Peer observation of teaching: A feasible and effective method of physician faculty development.

Authors:  Macy Stockdill; Bailey Hendricks; Michael D Barnett; Marie Bakitas; Caroline N Harada
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Educ       Date:  2022-02-23

9.  Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool.

Authors:  Peter B Sullivan; Alexandra Buckle; Gregg Nicky; Sarah H Atkinson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jasmina Sterz; Sebastian H Höfer; Bernd Bender; Maren Janko; Farzin Adili; Miriam Ruesseler
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.