Literature DB >> 17429506

Pharmacy students' perceptions of a teaching evaluation process.

Christopher K Surratt1, Shane P Desselle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess PharmD students' perceptions of the usefulness of Duquesne University's Teaching Effectiveness Questionnaire (TEQ), the instrument currently employed for student evaluation of teaching.
METHODS: Opinions of PharmD students regarding the TEQ were measured using a survey instrument comprised of Likert-type scales eliciting perceptions, behaviors, and self-reported biases.
RESULTS: PharmD students viewed student evaluation of teaching as appropriate and necessary, but conceded that the faculty members receiving the best evaluations were not always the most effective teachers. Most students indicated a willingness to complete the TEQ when given the opportunity but expressed frustration that their feedback did not appear to improve subsequent teaching efforts.
CONCLUSION: The current TEQ mechanism for student evaluation of teaching is clearly useful but nevertheless imperfect with respect to its ability to improve teaching. Future research may examine other aspects of pharmacy students' roles as evaluators of teaching.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17429506      PMCID: PMC1847549          DOI: 10.5688/aj710106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  1 in total

1.  The Doctor Fox Lecture: a paradigm of educational seduction.

Authors:  D H Naftulin; J E Ware; F A Donnelly
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1973-07
  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  Development of a peer teaching-assessment program and a peer observation and evaluation tool.

Authors:  Jennifer M Trujillo; Margarita V DiVall; Judith Barr; Michael Gonyeau; Jenny A Van Amburgh; S James Matthews; Donna Qualters
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Teaching evaluation practices in colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Authors:  Candace W Barnett; Hewitt W Matthews
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  How Faculty Recognized for Teaching Excellence Interpret and Respond to Student Ratings of Teaching.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Cindy D Stowe; Dina Ali; Frank Romanelli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Assessment of full-time faculty preceptors by colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States and Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Harold L Kirschenbaum; Tina Zerilli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Factors that influence student completion of course and faculty evaluations.

Authors:  Catherine L Hatfield; Elizabeth A Coyle
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Educational Outcomes Resulting From Restructuring a Scholarship Course for Doctor of Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  MaryPeace McRae; Teresa M Salgado; Julie A Patterson; Benjamin W Van Tassell; Jeremy S Stultz; Amy L Pakyz; Katherine Henderson; Leticia R Moczygemba; Kai I Cheang
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Changes to the Student Evaluation of Teaching Process.

Authors:  Vasudha Gupta; Velliyur Viswesh; Catherine Cone; Elizabeth Unni
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Should Student Evaluation of Teaching Play a Significant Role in the Formal Assessment of Dental Faculty? Two Viewpoints: Viewpoint 1: Formal Faculty Assessment Should Include Student Evaluation of Teaching and Viewpoint 2: Student Evaluation of Teaching Should Not Be Part of Formal Faculty Assessment.

Authors:  Susan Rowan; Elmer J Newness; Sotirios Tetradis; Joanne L Prasad; Ching-Chang Ko; Arlene Sanchez
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.