Literature DB >> 19324834

Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness.

Amanda Bretman1, Claudia Fricke, Tracey Chapman.   

Abstract

Evolutionary and plastic responses by males to the level of sperm competition (SC) are reported across widespread taxa, but direct tests of the consequences for male reproductive success in a competitive context are lacking. We varied male perception of SC to examine the effect on male competitive reproductive success and to test whether the outcomes were as predicted by theory. Exposure to rival males prior to mating increased a male's ejaculate investment (measured as mating duration); by contrast, exposure to rival males in the mating arena decreased mating duration. The results therefore suggested that SC intensity is important in shaping male responses to SC in this system, although the patterns were not strictly in accord with existing theory. We then tested whether males that responded to the level of SC had higher reproductive fitness in a competitive context. We found that males kept with rivals prior to mating again mated for longer; furthermore, they achieved significantly higher paternity share regardless of whether they were the first or second males to mate with a female. The plastic strategies employed by males therefore resulted in significantly increased reproductive success in a competitive context, even following subsequent rematings in which the majority of sperm were displaced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324834      PMCID: PMC2660996          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  26 in total

1.  Why it is difficult to model sperm displacement in Drosophila melanogaster: the relation between sperm transfer and copulation duration.

Authors:  A S Gilchrist; L Partridge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Charles K Cornwallis; Hanne Løvlie; Sven Jakobsson; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A matter of taste: direct detection of female mating status in the bedbug.

Authors:  Michael T Siva-Jothy; Alistair D Stutt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The evolution of sperm-allocation strategies and the degree of sperm competition.

Authors:  Paul D Williams; Troy Day; Erin Cameron
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The effects of crowding on courtship and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S Crossley; B Wallace
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Determination of paternity in dragonflies by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  H Hadrys; B Schierwater; S L Dellaporta; R DeSalle; L W Buss
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Sperm competition games: sperm size and sperm number under adult control.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1993-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The Acp26Aa seminal fluid protein is a modulator of early egg hatchability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Chapman; L A Herndon; Y Heifetz; L Partridge; M F Wolfner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Male mammals respond to a risk of sperm competition conveyed by odours of conspecific males.

Authors:  Javier Delbarco-Trillo; Michael H Ferkin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genetic evidence reveals density-dependent mediated success of alternative mating behaviours in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus).

Authors:  M Reichard; C Smith; W C Jordan
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  75 in total

Review 1.  It's all in your head: the role of quantity estimation in sperm competition.

Authors:  Eran M Shifferman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mating with large males decreases the immune defence of females in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Imroze; N G Prasad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Individual plastic responses by males to rivals reveal mismatches between behaviour and fitness outcomes.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; James D Westmancoat; Matthew J G Gage; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sex and the public: Social eavesdropping, sperm competition risk and male mate choice.

Authors:  Martin Plath; David Bierbach
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-05

5.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Perception of male-male competition influences Drosophila copulation behaviour even in species where females rarely remate.

Authors:  Anne Lizé; Rowan J Doff; Eve A Smaller; Zenobia Lewis; Gregory D D Hurst
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 7.  Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Akanksha Singh; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Kin recognition in Drosophila: the importance of ecology and gut microbiota.

Authors:  Anne Lizé; Raegan McKay; Zenobia Lewis
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Protein-specific manipulation of ejaculate composition in response to female mating status in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Laura K Sirot; Mariana F Wolfner; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Social competition stimulates cognitive performance in a sex-specific manner.

Authors:  James Rouse; Laurin McDowall; Zak Mitchell; Elizabeth J Duncan; Amanda Bretman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.