Literature DB >> 21752815

Perception of male-male competition influences Drosophila copulation behaviour even in species where females rarely remate.

Anne Lizé1, Rowan J Doff, Eve A Smaller, Zenobia Lewis, Gregory D D Hurst.   

Abstract

Males in many taxa are known to exhibit behavioural plasticity in response to the perceived intensity of sperm competition, reflected in Drosophila melanogaster by increased copulation duration following prior exposure to a rival. We tested the prediction that males do not adjust their copulation effort in response to the presence of a competitor in Drosophila species where there is little or no sperm competition. Contrary to expectations, male plasticity in copulation duration was found in both Drosophila subobscura and Drosophila acanthoptera, species in which females rarely remate. These results are discussed in relation to the adaptive basis of plasticity in these species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21752815      PMCID: PMC3259955          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

1.  Mating system evolution in sperm-heteromorphic Drosophila.

Authors:  R R. Snook; T A. Markow
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 2.  Female remating, sperm competition and sexual selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Shree Ram Singh; Bashisth N Singh; Hugo F Hoenigsberg
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2002-09-30

3.  Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J. Genet. 1956, 54, 261-279.

Authors:  J Maynard Smith
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 4.  Assessing sexual conflict in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.

Authors:  William R Rice; Andrew D Stewart; Edward H Morrow; Jodell E Linder; Nicole Orteiza; Phillip G Byrne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The cost of mating rises nonlinearly with copulation frequency in a laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Kuijper; A D Stewart; W R Rice
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Perceived sperm competition intensity influences seminal fluid protein production prior to courtship and mating.

Authors:  Kenneth M Fedorka; Wade E Winterhalter; Brian Ware
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates.

Authors:  A H Harcourt; P H Harvey; S G Larson; R V Short
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-09-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Males use multiple, redundant cues to detect mating rivals.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; James D Westmancoat; Matthew J G Gage; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Seminal fluid protein allocation and male reproductive success.

Authors:  Stuart Wigby; Laura K Sirot; Jon R Linklater; Norene Buehner; Federico C F Calboli; Amanda Bretman; Mariana F Wolfner; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  13 in total

1.  Kin recognition in Drosophila: the importance of ecology and gut microbiota.

Authors:  Anne Lizé; Raegan McKay; Zenobia Lewis
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Extreme cost of rivalry in a monandrous species: male-male interactions result in failure to acquire mates and reduced longevity.

Authors:  Anne Lizé; Thomas A R Price; Chloe Heys; Zenobia Lewis; Gregory D D Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  An X-linked meiotic drive allele has strong, recessive fitness costs in female Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  William Larner; Tom Price; Luke Holman; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evolution of mating behavior between two populations adapting to common environmental conditions.

Authors:  Margarida Bárbaro; Mário S Mira; Inês Fragata; Pedro Simões; Margarida Lima; Miguel Lopes-Cunha; Bárbara Kellen; Josiane Santos; Susana A M Varela; Margarida Matos; Sara Magalhães
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  No evidence for heritability of male mating latency or copulation duration across social environments in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Michelle L Taylor; Jonathan P Evans; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  True polyandry and pseudopolyandry: why does a monandrous fly remate?

Authors:  David N Fisher; Rowan J Doff; Tom A R Price
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Assessment of rival males through the use of multiple sensory cues in the fruitfly Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Chris P Maguire; Anne Lizé; Tom A R Price
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The role of species-specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; James Rouse; James D Westmancoat; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  The heritability of mating behaviour in a fly and its plasticity in response to the threat of sperm competition.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; Anne Lizé; Craig A Walling; Tom A R Price
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Male control of mating duration following exposure to rivals in fruitflies.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; James D Westmancoat; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.