Literature DB >> 22171084

It's all in your head: the role of quantity estimation in sperm competition.

Eran M Shifferman1.   

Abstract

The study of animal cognition has provided valuable data throughout the years, yet its reliance on laboratory work leaves some open questions. The main question is whether animals employ cognition in daily decision-making. The following discussion uses sperm competition (SC) as a test case for demonstrating the effect of cognition on routine choices, in this case, sexual selection. Cognition is manifested here by males' ability to represent the number of rivals competing with them. I claim that response to SC is driven by quantity estimation and the ability to assess competition magnitude cognitively. Hence, cognition can determine males' response to SC, and consequentially it can be selected within this context. This supports the argument that cognition constitutes an integral part of an individual's toolbox in solving real-life problems, and shows that physical and behavioural phenomena can expose cognition to selection and facilitate its evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22171084      PMCID: PMC3259941          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  43 in total

1.  A matter of taste: direct detection of female mating status in the bedbug.

Authors:  Michael T Siva-Jothy; Alistair D Stutt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evolution of sperm quality but not quantity in the internally fertilized fish Xiphophorus nigrensis.

Authors:  C C Smith; M J Ryan
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Learning effects on sperm competition and reproductive fitness.

Authors:  R Nicolle Matthews; Michael Domjan; Mary Ramsey; David Crews
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-09

Review 5.  Its own reward: lessons to be drawn from the reversed-reward contingency paradigm.

Authors:  Eran M Shifferman
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Perceived sperm competition intensity influences seminal fluid protein production prior to courtship and mating.

Authors:  Kenneth M Fedorka; Wade E Winterhalter; Brian Ware
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Female guppies Poecilia reticulata prefer males that can learn fast.

Authors:  A J Shohet; P J Watt
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.051

9.  Social cues of sperm competition influence accessory reproductive gland size in a promiscuous mammal.

Authors:  Jean-François Lemaître; Steven A Ramm; Jane L Hurst; Paula Stockley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Audience effects in the Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana)-prudent male mate choice in response to perceived sperm competition risk?

Authors:  Madlen Ziege; Kristin Mahlow; Carmen Hennige-Schulz; Claudia Kronmarck; Ralph Tiedemann; Bruno Streit; Martin Plath
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.172

View more
  8 in total

1.  Flexible memory controls sperm competition responses in male Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Rouse; K Watkinson; A Bretman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Social competition stimulates cognitive performance in a sex-specific manner.

Authors:  James Rouse; Laurin McDowall; Zak Mitchell; Elizabeth J Duncan; Amanda Bretman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, respond differently to the scent marks of multiple male conspecifics.

Authors:  Michael H Ferkin; Nicholas J Hobbs
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Trained Quantity Abilities in Horses (Equus caballus): A Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-25

5.  No evidence that relatedness or familiarity modulates male harm in Drosophila melanogaster flies from a wild population.

Authors:  Ana Marquez-Rosado; Clara Garcia-Co; Claudia Londoño-Nieto; Pau Carazo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Does perception of female cues modulate male short-term fitness components in Drosophila melanogaster?

Authors:  Quentin Corbel; Claudia Londoño-Nieto; Pau Carazo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Numerical cognition in bees and other insects.

Authors:  Mario Pahl; Aung Si; Shaowu Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-18

8.  Quantity Estimation Based on Numerical Cues in the Mealworm Beetle (Tenebrio molitor).

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Reyes Fernández-Perea; Enrique Font
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.