Literature DB >> 19324779

Temporal mechanisms of multimodal binding.

David Burr1, Ottavia Silva, Guido Marco Cicchini, Martin S Banks, Maria Concetta Morrone.   

Abstract

The simultaneity of signals from different senses-such as vision and audition-is a useful cue for determining whether those signals arose from one environmental source or from more than one. To understand better the sensory mechanisms for assessing simultaneity, we measured the discrimination thresholds for time intervals marked by auditory, visual or auditory-visual stimuli, as a function of the base interval. For all conditions, both unimodal and cross-modal, the thresholds followed a characteristic 'dipper function' in which the lowest thresholds occurred when discriminating against a non-zero interval. The base interval yielding the lowest threshold was roughly equal to the threshold for discriminating asynchronous from synchronous presentations. Those lowest thresholds occurred at approximately 5, 15 and 75 ms for auditory, visual and auditory-visual stimuli, respectively. Thus, the mechanisms mediating performance with cross-modal stimuli are considerably slower than the mechanisms mediating performance within a particular sense. We developed a simple model with temporal filters of different time constants and showed that the model produces discrimination functions similar to the ones we observed in humans. Both for processing within a single sense, and for processing across senses, temporal perception is affected by the properties of temporal filters, the outputs of which are used to estimate time offsets, correlations between signals, and more.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324779      PMCID: PMC2674495          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  52 in total

1.  Pedestal effect in visual motion discrimination.

Authors:  W A Simpson; B A Finsten
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model.

Authors:  M C Morrone; D C Burr
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-12-22

3.  Motion analysis by feature tracking.

Authors:  M M Del Viva; M C Morrone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Motion deblurring in human vision.

Authors:  D C Burr; M J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Contrast discrimination in noise.

Authors:  G E Legge; D Kersten; A E Burgess
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Modeling the additivity of nonsimultaneous masking.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: evidence for spatial primitives in human vision.

Authors:  R J Watt; M J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model.

Authors:  J M Foley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 9.  Perception and estimation of time.

Authors:  P Fraisse
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  25 in total

1.  Exploring the mammalian sensory space: co-operations and trade-offs among senses.

Authors:  Sirpa Nummela; Henry Pihlström; Kai Puolamäki; Mikael Fortelius; Simo Hemilä; Tom Reuter
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The dynamics of multimodal integration: The averaging diffusion model.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Juan Gao; Scott Koenig; Dylan Palfy; James L McClelland
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Rhythmic motor behaviour influences perception of visual time.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Tiziana Vercillo; Francesco Torricelli; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Multisensory decision-making in rats and humans.

Authors:  David Raposo; John P Sheppard; Paul R Schrater; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Six Degrees of Auditory Spatial Separation.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Alex Fox; Emily Orchard-Mills; Johahn Leung; David Alais
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-31

6.  Multisensory decisions provide support for probabilistic number representations.

Authors:  Ingmar Kanitscheider; Amanda Brown; Alexandre Pouget; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The optimal time window of visual-auditory integration: a reaction time analysis.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11

8.  Contextual effects in interval-duration judgements in vision, audition and touch.

Authors:  David Burr; Eleonora Della Rocca; Eleonora Della Rocca; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Predictive coding of multisensory timing.

Authors:  Zhuanghua Shi; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.