Literature DB >> 22423093

Multisensory decision-making in rats and humans.

David Raposo1, John P Sheppard, Paul R Schrater, Anne K Churchland.   

Abstract

We report a novel multisensory decision task designed to encourage subjects to combine information across both time and sensory modalities. We presented subjects, humans and rats, with multisensory event streams, consisting of a series of brief auditory and/or visual events. Subjects made judgments about whether the event rate of these streams was high or low. We have three main findings. First, we report that subjects can combine multisensory information over time to improve judgments about whether a fluctuating rate is high or low. Importantly, the improvement we observed was frequently close to, or better than, the statistically optimal prediction. Second, we found that subjects showed a clear multisensory enhancement both when the inputs in each modality were redundant and when they provided independent evidence about the rate. This latter finding suggests a model where event rates are estimated separately for each modality and fused at a later stage. Finally, because a similar multisensory enhancement was observed in both humans and rats, we conclude that the ability to optimally exploit sequentially presented multisensory information is not restricted to a particular species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22423093      PMCID: PMC3335889          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4998-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  38 in total

1.  Touch can change visual slant perception.

Authors:  M O Ernst; M S Banks; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Frequency and intensity response properties of single neurons in the auditory cortex of the behaving macaque monkey.

Authors:  G H Recanzone; D C Guard; M L Phan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect.

Authors:  D A Slutsky; G H Recanzone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges.

Authors:  M S Landy; H Kojima
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task.

Authors:  Jamie D Roitman; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Alexandre Pouget; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception.

Authors:  Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?

Authors:  David C Knill; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  An irrelevant light enhances auditory detection in humans: a psychophysical analysis of multisensory integration in stimulus detection.

Authors:  Christopher T Lovelace; Barry E Stein; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-07
View more
  85 in total

1.  Optimal visual-vestibular integration under conditions of conflicting intersensory motion profiles.

Authors:  John S Butler; Jennifer L Campos; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Posterior Parietal Cortex Guides Visual Decisions in Rats.

Authors:  Angela M Licata; Matthew T Kaufman; David Raposo; Michael B Ryan; John P Sheppard; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dynamic weighting of multisensory stimuli shapes decision-making in rats and humans.

Authors:  John P Sheppard; David Raposo; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Characterization of decision commitment rule alterations during an auditory change detection task.

Authors:  Bridgette Johnson; Rebeka Verma; Manying Sun; Timothy D Hanks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Changes in white matter in mice resulting from low-frequency brain stimulation.

Authors:  Denise M Piscopo; Aldis P Weible; Mary K Rothbart; Michael I Posner; Cristopher M Niell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cognitive neuroscience: sensory noise drives bad decisions.

Authors:  Matthew T Kaufman; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A Neural Signature of Divisive Normalization at the Level of Multisensory Integration in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Tomokazu Ohshiro; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  Approaches to Understanding Multisensory Dysfunction in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Justin K Siemann; Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.216

Review 10.  Perceptual Decision-Making: A Field in the Midst of a Transformation.

Authors:  Farzaneh Najafi; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.